The OSeMOSYS – CR model¶
Abbreviations¶
Abbreviations |
Description |
---|---|
ARESEP |
Regulatory Authority of Public Services |
CANATRAC |
National Cargo Transport Chamber |
CENCE |
National Center of Energy Control |
CNFL |
National Company of Light and Power |
CTP |
Public Transportation Council |
dESA |
division of Energy System (from KTH) |
ETSAP |
Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program |
ICE |
Costa Rican Electricity Institute |
IEA |
International Energy Agency |
IMN |
National Meteorological Institute |
INCOFER |
Costa Rican Railway Institute |
IPCC |
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
HACIENDA |
Ministry of Finance |
KTH |
Royal Institute of Technology - Analysis |
MOPT |
Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Transportation |
RITEVE |
Techical Vehicular Revision |
RECOPE |
Costa Rican Oil Refinery |
1. Introduction PNE¶
1.1 Projects overview¶
The creation of OSeMOSYS-CR started as part of the “Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project in Latin America and the Caribbean (DDPP-LAC)” which is coordinated by the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI) and the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) [1] [2].
The project involves six different teams, and each team is formed by experts from a Latin American (LA) country (Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru) and experts from other countries (France, USA, Sweden and Brazil). The main purpose of these alliances is to transfer capacities from one country to another, while engaging with policy makers to address a modeling aspect of local importance.
The Costa Rican team is composed by researchers from the University of Costa Rica (UCR) and the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm, and focuses on the development of an Energy System Optimization Model (ESOM) for its energy system, paying particular attention to the electricity and the transport sectors, to establish the most cost-effective technological transition towards a deep decarbonization, while assessing the corresponding impacts over the economy and society. The project also aims at promoting a dialogue on the national policy related to the future concerning the decarbonization of the economy.
The development of OSeMOSYS-CR has been also supported by the project “Assessing Options to Decarbonize the Transport Sector under Technological Uncertainty: The Case of Costa Rica”. This work was contracted by the Interamerican Development Bank (IADB) for the Directorate of Climate Change (DCC) of the Ministry of Environment and Energy in Costa Rica. The project aimed at developing a framework to evaluate mitigation actions in the Costa Rican transport sector that contribute to achieve the deep decarbonization, considering its uncertainty and socioeconomic impact, and implementing it in OSeMOSYS-CR to evaluate multiple climate actions towards a clean transport sector [3].
The project “Development And Assesment of Decarbonization Pathways to Inform Dialogue with Costa Rica Regarding The Updating Process of Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC)” also contributed to upgrading OSeMOSYS-CR. It involved the development of complementary land and water models, and the integration of them with the energy model. This project was funded by the World Bank for the Directorate of Climate Change (DCC) of the Ministry of Environment and Energy in Costa Rica.
This is the first released version of OSeMOSYS-CR, however the model is expected to grow and new versions will be shared.
1.2 Motivation and problem statement¶
Costa Rica is a Latin American country worldwide known for its environmental protection, political, social and economic stability, and renewable electricity generation. Despite these achievements, there are many challenges to tackle in the energy sector, especially when it concerns transportation. According to the 2016’s National Energy Balance [4], in the country’s energy mix, fossil fuels arethe main energy source with an overwhelming 62.6%. The transport sector accounts for 82.8% of the total fossiel fuel consumption and at the same time corresponds to approximately 44 % of national Green House Gases (GHG) emissions [5].
The previously mentioned challenges are exacerbated by the international and national commitments that Costa Rica has acquired, such as its ambitious NDCs [7]. Therefore, it is crucial for the country to further transform the energy sector by reducing oil consumption through alternative sources, and create a more sustainable energy mix. In this context, the main purpose of the project is to develop an ESOM to characterize the transport and electricity sectors. The objective is to analyze the energy system in order to identify decarbonization pathways scenarios focusing on the transport sector through the examination of transport scenarios with different vectors of final energy demand.
The produced ESOM will support policymakers in Costa Rica understanding the most suitable strategies to achieve a deep decarbonization. It could also be used to decide what type of technologies (in the electricity and transport sector) should be incentivized for the different scenarios. In addition, the project aims to produce a scalable ESOM that will remain in the government for different energy related decisions. The project tries to understand the percentage of existing fossil-based taxis, buses, and light-duty vehicles that should be changed to other more efficient technologies (electric, biogas, etc.). While the previous example applies for the transport sector, similar conclusions are expected in terms of the electricity sector. The modeling tool chosen was the Open Source energy Modelling System (OSeMOSYS) [6].
1.3 The Open Source energy Modelling System (OSeMOSYS)¶
OSeMOSYS is an optimization software for long-term energy planning. It is an open source model structured in blocks of functionality that allows easy modifications to the code, providing a great flexibility for the creative process of the solution. The models that are built in OSeMOSYS minimize the total cost of the system for a certain period of time, defining the configuration of the supply system, considering some restrictions on activity, capacity, and emissions of technologies [6]. This is shown in the following equation:
where: y corresponds to the year, t to the technology and r to the region.
The discounted cost can be expressed as follows:
where:
DOC (Discounted Operational Cost): Corresponds to the cost related to maintenance (fixed, usually associate to capacity) and operation of technologies (variable, linked to fuel uses and level of activity).
DCI (Discounted Capital Investment): It is the cost of investment of all technologies selected to supply energy on the whole period.
DTEP (Discounted Technology Emission Penalty): It is associated to the use of pollutants. The calculation is based on the emission factor and the activity of technologies and the specific cost by pollutant.
DSV (Discounted Salvage Value): As the capital cost is discounted in the first year a technology is acquired, if in the last year of study the technologies have remaining years of operational life, the corresponding value is counted.
2. Energy model: Framework¶
This documentation has been created in order to provide an overview of OSeMOSYS-CR. Therefore, it presents the model structure, and gives a synthesis of the key assumptions of the model, regarding the numerical inputs used for the sets, parameters, and scenario building. First, in this section, we give an insight to the general framework of the model.
2.1 General model structure¶
The Costa Rican energy sector is enterly modeled in OSeMOSYS. However, while the transport and electricity sectors are subject to linear optimization, other smaller demands, such as the firewood used in the residential sector or the coke consumption by industries, are only represented with trends to account for their possible greenhouse gases (GHG) contributions. The overall structure of the model can be represented by the reference energy system shown in Figure 2.1. The primary energy supply consists of four main sources: renewable, imports of fossil fuels, biomass and electricity imports. These sources are transformed in order to satisfy different demands including industrial, residential and commercial requirements, and the transport demands of passengers (public and private) and cargo (light and heavy).

(a)¶

(b)¶
Figure 2.1: Simplified Reference Energy System of the Costa Rica model for the (a) Electricity and (b) Transport sectors
In OSeMOSYS-CR, the connection between the electricity and transport sectors is crucial for understanding the technological transition of fossil-powered vehicles to other options with lower or zero carbon emissions. The next section describes the group of sets considered in OSeMOSYS-CR for representing the elements commented above.
2.2 Sets¶
The sets are responsible for defining the structure of the model (i.e. temporal space, geographic space, elements of the system, etc.). In OSeMOSYS, the group of sets include: years, fuels, technologies, emissions and modes of operation. As it going to be further explained, the sets are characterized through parameters. These subsections present the sets that compose the current version of OSeMOSYS-CR.
2.2.1 Year¶
This corresponds to the period of analysis. For OSeMOSYS-CR it is from 2015 to 2050. However, the data from 2015 to 2018 is set acccording to historical information.
2.2.2 Fuels¶
Figure 2.2 shows the different levels and transformations that the fuels (i.e. commodities) go through, and their relations with some technologies. Groups E0, E1, E3, E4, E5, and E6 are crucial elements of the current supply chain, while E8 and E9 are modeled for control purposes. Groups E9, E10 and E11 complement the model to enable the inclusion of hydrogen and infrastructure.

Figure 2.2: Simple diagram for fuel specification.¶
Table 2.1 presents a synthesis of the groups of commodities, including a brief description and examples.
Table 2.1: Summary of fuels included in OSeMOSYS-CR’s energy model.
Group |
Descriptions |
Examples |
---|---|---|
E0 |
Pre-sources: Imports and fuel production |
Import and production (fossil fuels and Biofuels), and their distribution. |
E1 |
Primary sources (energy balance) |
Water, Wind, diesel, gasoline, biomass, and firewood. |
E2-E3 |
Electricity |
Electricity from power plants to its distribution. |
E4 |
Electricity demand by sector |
Diesel for agriculture, firewood for residential, petroleum coke for industry. |
E6-E6* |
Transport demand |
Private and public passenger transport, and light and heavy cargo transport. |
E7 |
Distribution |
Diesel for industry, LPG for heavy cargo transport, electricity for vehicles. |
E8 |
Transport managers |
Fossil fuels for public transport, low carbon fuels for light freight. |
E10 |
Infraestrucuture |
Roads, rails, and bikeways. |
E11 |
Specific category for Hydrogen |
Produced hydrogen and ready to use. |
See Annex for the whole list of fuels.
2.2.3 Technologies¶
Different types of technologies (i.e. processes) are included in the model in order to represent the current supply chain and substitution possibilities. Figure 2.3 shows the different levels and transformation of technologies.

Figure 2.3: Simple diagram for technologies specification.¶
The groups of technolgies contemplated in OSeMOSYS-CR are described below:
The first groups (ES, BL and DIST) are specially designed to model fossil fuels imports, production of biofuels, and the blend and distribution of them, considering the current pipe system for gasoline and diesel.
The second group of blocks corresponds to the electric power system (PP and TD), that is mainly connected to renewable primary sources.
The third level corresponds to civil infrastructure for mobility: TI and intermediate technologies for controlling the systems and divide the supply chains regarding fuels and technologies.
TR technologies are dedicated to transport modelling and include blocks to study the modal shift.
ED connects primary sources and demands that are not subject to the optimization process, but have GHG contributions.
Table 2.2 presents a synthesis of the groups of technologies in OSeMOSYS-CR, including a brief description and examples.
Table 2.2: Summary of technologies included in OSeMOSYS-CR’s energy model.
Group |
Descriptions |
Examples |
---|---|---|
ES-BL-DIST |
Energy Sources |
Imports and production (fossil fuels and biofuels), and their distribution. |
PP-TD |
Power plants and the electric grid |
Hydro Power Plant, Transmission system, and distributed generation. |
ST |
Sources |
Water, Wind, diesel, gasoline, biomass, and firewood. |
D(F-T) |
Division |
Diesel for Industry, LPG for heavy cargo transport, Electricity for vehicles. |
TI |
Transport infrastructure |
Roads, rails, and bikeways. |
TR |
Transportation |
Electric Light duty Vehicles, LPG Buses, bikes, low carbon techs for passenger |
ED |
Sources |
Water, Wind, diesel, gasoline, biomass, and firewood. |
See Annex for the whole list of processes.
2.2.4 Emissions¶
Table 2.3 shows a description of the emissions included in the model. In general, to quantify GHG contributions, the values are in terms of equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2e).
Table 2.3: Summary of emissions included in OSeMOSYS-CR’s energy model.
Code |
Name |
---|---|
CO2_sources |
Carbon Dioxide from primary sources |
CO2_transport |
Carbon Dioxide from transport |
CO2_AGR |
Carbon Dioxide from agriculture |
CO2_COM |
Carbon Dioxide from the commercial sector |
CO2_IND |
Carbon Dioxide from the industrial sector |
CO2_RES |
Carbon Dioxide from the residential sector |
CO2_Freigt |
Carbon Dioxide from freigt transport |
CO2_HeavyCargo |
Carbon Dioxide from heavy cargo |
CO2_LightCargo |
Carbon Dioxide from light cargo |
In addition, with this set the model incorporates benefits resulting from the implementation of mitigation policies in the energy sector. These are:
Health improvements of the population as a result of a reduction in GHG emissions.
Reduction of congestion, which leads to an increase in the country’s productivity.
Reduction of accidents on the national roads.
2.2.5 Mode of operation¶
The model has one mode of operation, Mode 1, for representing the normal operation of the system.
2.2.6 Region¶
The model has a nationwide scope, therefore it only has one region: Costa Rica (CR).
3. Energy model: Data inputs¶
This section presents the main databases explored for building OSeMOSYS-CR, and the way the information was processed in order to introduce it to the model.
3.1 Main data sources¶
3.1.1 Energy balance of Costa Rica¶
The energy balance is the most important source of data for the energy model of OSeMOSYS-CR, which is prepared by the Secretariat of Planning of the Energy Subsector (SEPSE). The analysis gathers and processes data from institutions such as the Costa Rica Institute of Electricity (ICE), the Costa Rican Petroleum Refinery (RECOPE) and the National Center of Energy Control (CENCE). The information is usually presented annually with excel books and a SANKEY diagram. In Costa Rica, the fossil fuels are completely imported, and the electricity is generated almost completely with renewable sources [4].
Figure 3.1 presents the historical trending of energy consumption by sector.
3.1.2 Other key databases¶
In the model, all fuels and technologies are incorporated to OSeMOSYS taking into account other sets, such as temporary divisions and emission, as well as the parameters. The latter are classified, among others, into costs, activity levels and infrastructure capacities. The establishment of these parameters was done after processing and reviewing the available national energy data. Table 3.1 summarizes the main souces of data for OSeMOSYS-CR.
Table 3.1: Main data sources used in OSeMOSYS-CR.
Category |
Source |
Data |
Descriptions and assumption made |
---|---|---|---|
Energy System |
SEPSE |
Energy balance |
It is used to build the structure of the energy system, time-series of energy consumption from 1989 to 2017 and forecasted with ARIMA models. |
Demand |
SEPSE |
Final energy |
End-use information by sectors: industry, transport, households, services and agriculture. |
SEPSE RITEVE MOPT ETSAP |
Transport (passengers and cargo) |
It includes load factors, vehicle fleet, and energy consumption, efficiencies and annual kilometers. We combine international standard data of technologies with national records. Technological groups are defined to study modal change and fuel use. Non-motorized mobility is considered zero in the base case. |
|
Electricity technologies |
ICE Bloomberg IEA |
Capital and fixed costs |
Based on national data. The costs were assumed constant in the whole period, except for solar and wind systems, which decrease according to international trends. Residual capacity is constant. |
ICE |
Capacity and activity |
Based on the operational performance registered by the National Energy Control Centre. Operational life is according to national plans. |
|
Transport technologies |
Hacienda Bloomberg Companies |
Capital and fixed costs |
Based on the Ministry of Finance (Hacienda) database. We assumed that cost of electric vehicles decreases (Bloomberg). For cargo transport, we review cost of companies like Nicola and Tesla. |
SEPSE RITEVE MOPT |
Capacity and activity |
Based on the performance register by national surveys, concession for public transport and the annual Vehicle technical review (RITEVE). Operational life is according to manufacturers and the residual capacity decreases linearly and proportionally with this value. |
|
Fuel prices |
RECOPE IEA ARESEP |
Fossil Fuels and Biofuels |
Based on current tariffs and projection uses in national plans. It considers international prices and the tariff given by the regulator in Costa Rica (ARESEP) and trend provide by international Energy Agency (IEA). |
ICE ARESEP |
Electricity |
Base of the average of national tariffs and projections. |
|
SEPSE |
Biomass |
Not included. It is produced and consumed locally. |
|
ETSAP |
Hydrogen |
Based on data published by ETSAP. |
|
Infraestrucure |
ICE |
Plants and power grid |
Based on Transmission and generation national plans. It assumes losses of 4% from the bulk transmission system and 6% for distribution. Charging infrastructure is not included. |
RECOPE |
Pipeline and road distribution |
Based on national reports, we consider the current infraestructure does not grow (gasoline and diesel). It includes new infrastructure for LPG. The model includes natural gas but is not used. |
|
ETSAP |
Hydrogen |
Consider local production, road transport and supply stations. |
|
Sustainable mobility |
MINAE MOPT INCOFER |
Urban plans and mobility |
Regarding the Integrated Public Transport System, the cost consideration come from Costa Rican Railways Institute (INCOFER) and MOTP studies. |
Cargo transport |
MINAE MOPT INCOFER |
Electric cargo train and Logistic |
Costs from national reports and demand based on expert criteria given in the participatory process. |
Emissions |
IPCC |
Factors |
Based on the IPCC and the national GHG inventory. |
Co-benefits |
PEN IMF |
Coefficients |
It considers coefficients for health congestion and accidents by State of the Nation Project (PEN) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) |
The following sections presents the data incorporated in the paramters of OSeMOSYS-CR. This section presents mainly the information for used for establishing the base escenario of the model, and characterizing the commodities and processes included in the model.
3.2 Global parameters¶
These parameters affect directly other parameters.
3.2.1 Year split¶
Costa Rica regularly has 5 months of dry season, and 6 months of rainy season, with two months of transition. The ltter in OSeMOSYS-CR are evenly distributed in both times lices. Therefore, the model uses de values presented in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: Year split values in OSeMOSYS-CR.
Timeslice |
Year split value |
---|---|
DRY |
0.42 |
RAINY |
0.58 |
3.3 Demands¶
Based on the historical data of the energy balance, the demand projections were developed by using ARIMA models. These models are one of the most widely used approaches for time series forecasting. They correspond to simple univariate models focused on the long trend trajectory of the different time series. Their general structure is shown below:
General equation:
Simple delays:
where ϕ corresponds to operators, μ is the media of ϕ, θ is a coefficient, and s is a stational component.
This forecasting model gives good approximations of the data registered by institutions. The estimation begins with the analysis and forecasting of the time series corresponding to the primary sources. With these long term values, a specific trend is fixed by using the shares defined in the base year. A Hierarchical process was develop considering that the shares by each sector are the same on the base year. Figure 3.2 shows the general results of the projections and general annual demands.
In order to estimate the demands of the transport sector, an additional calculation is required, but the previously projections of energy consumption for transport (by fuel) are used as base. Using this variable allows to have a systematic monitoring of the supply chain. Another crucial variable is the relation between energy consumption and the annual average distance travelled by each group of technologies. The general equations for the estimation are shown below:
where:
Now, we are considering that this relation defined in the base year will be constant, assuming a no-policy scenario and taking into account that this data concentrates the efficiency of the road system and technologies. For more details, see the documentation of the InputActivityRatio parameter.
As a short example, the calculation of the demand for the gasoline light duty vehicles (TD_LDGSL) in the 2015 year, is shown below:
where:
Therefore:
This similar process was developed for every transport technology during all the years included in the analysis. In the process, the energy consumption changes according to the projection. The final calculation of the demands is presented in the figure 3.3.
The demands are introduced in two different parameters:
Specified Annual Demand and Specified Demand Profile.
Or we used the Accumulated Annual Demand, when the data corresponding to the profiles was unavailable.
3.3.1 Specified Annual Demand¶
According to the procedure explained above, this is used for the electricity and transport sectors. It contains the total annual demand.
3.3.2 Specified Annual Demand¶
According to the procedure explained above, this is used for the electricity and transport sectors. It represents the way this demand is distributed throughout the time slices. In OSeMOSYS-CR, this distribution is incorporated proportional to the duration of each time slice (i.e. 0.42 and 0.58 for dry and rainy season, respectively).
3.3.3 Acummulated Annual Demand¶
For the current model, the energy demands -different to electricity and transport- are assumed as constant throughout the years. The next demands are introduced in this parameter:
Industrial: Diesel, Fuel oil, Firewood, LPG, Biomass, and Petroleum coke.
Commerce: Firewood, and LPG.
Agriculture: Diesel.
Residential: Firewood, and LPG.
3.4 Performance¶
3.4.1 Capacity To Activity Unit¶
This parameter allows to relate the capacity and activity level of the technologies. For this model, this parameter is used to introduce the relation between power and energy of the electricity sector. Therefore, we convert the GWh to PJ, understanding that if 1 GW is constant throughout the year, the corresponding energy is 31,536 PJ
For other sectors, we assume a default value equal to 1, as the calculation is related only to energy.
3.4.2 Capacity Factor¶
The capacity factor is mainly used for representing electricity generation. In this case, historical data from 2011 to 2017 was the base to define the average value for every group of plants. Figure 3.4 shows the values of capacity factors for different power plants. For solar and wind power plants another possibility is to use some tools like renewable ninja.
3.4.3 Availability Factor¶
This value corresponds to the time that each technologies is available. OSeMOSYS-CR uses 0.9 for power plants (assuming a 0.1 portion of the time for maintenance works and reliability). For the transport sector, the model uses 1, since the vehicle fleet and the modes of mobility are distributed in the whole region and a combination of them can be used.
3.4.3 Operational Life¶
For this parameter, at the moment, the model employs a set of values used by KTH. In general, the most important investments have an operational life greater than the period of analysis. Table 3.3 shows the data used in the model.
Table 3.3: Summary of operational lifes used in the model.
Electricity sector |
Transport sector |
Infraestructure |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technologies |
Value |
Technologies |
Value |
Technologies |
Value |
Hydro dam |
80 |
Light duty |
15/12 |
Electric grid |
50 |
Hydro Run off river |
60 |
4WD |
10/12 |
Pipeline system |
50 |
Biomass Power Plant |
25 |
Motorcycle |
11/12 |
Biofuel production |
50 |
Geothermal Power P. |
40 |
Minivan |
15/12 |
H2 production |
50 |
Solar Distribution |
20 |
Buses |
15/12 |
||
Solar transmission |
40 |
Micro buses |
15/12 |
||
Wind Distribution |
20 |
Taxis |
10/12 |
||
Wind transmission |
40 |
Pickup truck |
15/12 |
||
Thermal |
25 |
Trucks |
15/12 |
3.4.4 Residual Capacity¶
The residual capacity expresses the capacity that already exists in the first year of analysis. The considerations regaring the electricity and transport sectors are presented below:
Electricity sector: As the most relevant plants in Costa Rica (especially Hydropower) have been recently improved in order to extend their operational life, the existing capacity in 2018 does not decrease through all the period of analysis. Figure 3.5 shows the reference values for 2018.
Transport sector: This calculation was made taking into account the vehicle fleet in 2015, the transport demand by sector and a decreasing number of vehicles proportional to the operational life. Figure 3.6 presents how the capacity of the current fleet is reduced over the years.
3.4.5 Input Activity Ratio¶
This value is key for building the structure of model, since it connects the fuels and technologies (i.e. it represents all the inputs each technology needs). Usually, it is referred as the inverse of the efficiency of the process (if the Output Activity Ratio parameter is 1).
In the case of the electricity sector, most part of the power plants are connected to renewable sources. Therefore it has been assumed a relation 1:1. With the exception of thermal plants, that are directly dependent of their variable cost (i.e. fuel). For the transmission and distribution grid, values proportional to losses (4% and 6%) were introduced. Table 3.4 shows the data used in OSeMOSYS-CR.
Table 3.4: Summary of input activity ratio for electric sector.
Input sources |
Technology group |
Value |
---|---|---|
Water, solar, wind, geothermal |
Renewable power plant |
1.000 |
Diesel |
Thermal power plant |
2.857 |
Fuel oil |
Thermal power plant |
2.174 |
Electricity from power plants |
Transmission grid |
1.040 |
Electricity from transmission |
Distribution grid |
1.060 |
For the transport sector, the input activity ratio corresponds to the relation between the energy consumption (in Joules) by technologies and the demand (in vkm, pkm or tkm). As a first reference, values taken by organizations such as ETSAP or manufactures are considered. Regarding Costa Rican data, the requirements are: energy consumption by the transport sector, number of vehicles in the fleet and annual average distance by category. The efficiency can be expressed as MJ/km, or MJ/pkm if the load factor (i.e. number of passagers, p, per vehicle) is included. The importance of using the load factor is that it eases the incorporation of modal change by unifying the demand.
The general equation for calculating the input activity ratio in passenger transportation tecnologies in OSeMOSYS-CR is:
The next example, Table 3.5, shows how to recalculate the efficiencies of two types of technologies: current and new technologies. Here, we use the example of gasoline light duty vehicles. The procedure consists of using the estimation based on the national relation and the proportion provided by one reliable source (in this cases, a data set by the KTH based on ETSAP).
Table 3.5: . Recalculation of the input activity ratio .
Technology |
KTH-ETSAP (MJ/km) |
KTH-ETSAP (proportion) |
CR data: (ECR_LDV)-1 (MJ/km) |
Recalculated (MJ/km) |
---|---|---|---|---|
LDV_GSL (current) |
3.78 (base) |
1.000 |
2.420 |
2.42 |
LDV_GSL (New) |
2.06 |
0.550 |
1.33 |
In this case, the data corresponding to the current vehicles is assumed equal to the national data. The data for new technologies is proportional to the relation estimated. As the relation between distance and energy consumption is a control variable that combines the efficiency of technologies and the road system, the value will be kept constant. This is done considering that the efficiency of the technologies will improve, while the conditions of the system will decrease.
3.4.5 Output Activity Ratio¶
This parameter works together alongside with the InputActivityRatio. Since the efficiency is stablished in the input, the OutputActivityRatio value is always 1. Therefore, its funciton in OSeMOSYS-CR is to connect the structure of the model.
3.5 Technology costs¶
Figure 3.7 shows the relation included in the model regarding costs. Usually, the capital and fixed costs are related with the capacity and the variable cost is linked to the activity level. The diagram shows what parameters are used for each group of technologies.

Figure 3.7: Cost chains of OSeMOSYS-CR, where CC: Capital Cost, VC: Variable Cost, FC: Fixed Cost and P: Penalty.¶
In order to understand the cost flow, that the model follows in order to satisfy a specific demand, a brief example is presented in Figure 3.8. The figure includes the relation between the electric grid, the pipe system and the vehicles for one year.

Figure 3.8: Brief example of the cost chain of the model.¶
In this example, we have two ways to satisfy 1 Gpkm: electricity and fossil fuels. We are not taking into account the depreciation in this example. The activity and capacity for the transport sector is the same, while for the electricity sector the Capacity-to-activity unit (31.536) is used. The general, equation is:
Electricity supply:
Fossil Fuels supply:
In this example, the fossil fuel chain is cheaper than the electricity-based solution. Additional conditions must be added, such as: the depreciation and variations in the costs. The next sections present the data used for the costs in the model.
3.5.1 Capital Cost¶
Regarding the transport sector, the capital cost information is based on information from the Ministry of Finance of Costa Rica (Hacienda). OSeMOSYS-CR assumes that the cost of electric vehicles decreases according to information from Bloomberg. For cargo transport, the model incorporates cost data from companies like Nicola and Tesla. The following equation shows how the capital cost is calculated:
For the electricity infraestructure such as power plants, the model uses information from the Costa Rican Institute of Electricity, ICE.
3.5.2 Fixed Cost¶
For the transport tecnologies, at the moment, the model uses information from a data set by the KTH based on ETSAP. The distribution of fossil fuels is parameterized with information from the Costa Rican Petroleum Refinery. On the other hand, the electricity distribution uses information from the Costa Rican Institute of Electricity, ICE.
3.5.3 Variable Cost¶
The variable cost in the model is mainly used for representing the imports of fossil fuels with trends set by the International Energy Agency (IEA).
3.6 Emissions¶
3.6.1 Emission Activity Ratio¶
This aspect of the model was parameterized with the National GHG Inventory.
3.6.2 Emission Penalty¶
To estimate the impact of an improved transport system, we assign an externality cost to each technology representing a vehicle. In sum, a decarbonization scenario has lower externality costs in comparison to a baseline, since the activity of transport technologies decrease. We evaluate the following aspects that are monetized: less traffic jams, fewer accidents and reduced negative impacts of pollution on health.
The externality costs from the impacts of pollution per unit of activity are obtained using data from the PIMUS report [8]. PIMUS assigns a cost per ton to three pollutants: NOx, SOx and PM10. To be applicable for the model, we estimate an externality cost per vehicle-kilometer traveled (vkm). The PIMUS report has emission factors per distance traveled and takes as reference the Grütter Report to estimate the vkm per vehicle type. To match the categories of the model, the following assumption is considered:
The emission categories of the PIMUS report are disaggregated per emission control type and fuel. Since the model is only disaggregated by fuel type, factors for vehicle types with the same fuel are averaged.
The cost of the emissions is presented in Table 3.6.
Table 3.6: Externalities associated to health caused per vehicle type [MUSD/Gvkm].
. |
NOX |
SOX |
PM10 |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Light Duty Passenger Vehicles-Gasoline |
2.66 |
0.37 |
0.28 |
3.31 |
Light Duty Passenger Vehicles-Diesel |
1.84 |
1.40 |
4.23 |
7.48 |
Light Freight |
2.38 |
1.97 |
4.99 |
9.33 |
Minibus |
13.74 |
5.10 |
9.69 |
28.53 |
Heavy Duty (Heavy Freight and Buses) |
22.03 |
7.19 |
32.54 |
61.75 |
Gasoline Motorcycles |
0.83 |
0.11 |
7.90 |
8.84 |
For congestion, the PEN states that the annual cost is equivalent to 2.5 USD Billion, whereas PIMUS calculates 691 USD Million. The latter uses factors per vkm that try to capture the cost of the lost productivity, higher maintenance and stress, whereas the first estimated the change in time of congested roadways against non-congested ones per county and multiplied it by an average income (representing the lost productivity). Since the methodologies are different, we pick the factor based on the vkm variable, since time is not accounted for in the model. The estimates of PIMUS are based on the Victoria Transport Policy Institute bibliography as well as the Grütter report. The values used are shown in Table 3.7.
Table 3.7: Externalities associated to congestion caused per vehicle type [MUSD/Gvkm].
Technology |
Externality cost [MUSD/Gvkm] |
---|---|
Light Duty Vehicles |
46 |
Minivan |
46 |
SUV |
168.1328377 |
Taxi |
46 |
Minibus |
46 |
Bus |
90 |
Light Freight |
90 |
Heavy Freight |
90 |
Motorcycles |
46 |
The PIMUS report states that one death costs (CD) 738,130 USD and the cost of an injury (CI) is 179,260 USD. We also review the Statistical Book of COSEVI for 2017 to obtain the number of deaths and injuries per vehicle type: motorcycle, light duty vehicle and minibus or bus [9]. We do not consider accidents for light and heavy freight for the lack for the lack of public statistics. We use the equation 1 to define the factor per vkm for each vehicle type (vt).
To complete the equation, we use the Gvkm stated in the PIMUS report. Nonetheless, since the Gvkm in PIMUS are for the Great Metropolitan Area, we adjust the cost of the deaths and injuries with the factors kD and kI , respectively, to avoid over-penalization [8]. Table 3.8 shows the results.
Table 3.8: Externalities associated to accidents caused per vehicle type [MUSD/Gvkm].
Technology |
Externality cost [MUSD/Gvkm] |
---|---|
Light Duty Vehicles |
91.64 |
Minivan |
91.64 |
SUV |
91.64 |
Taxi |
91.64 |
Minibus |
101.87 |
Bus |
101.87 |
Motorcycles |
635.24 |
4. Energy model: Scenario building¶
OSeMOSYS-CR started by estimating a base case, and subsequently, including the effect of a set of policies defined by stakeholders in a decarbonization scenarios. This exercise allowed the creation of the following scenarios:
A Business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, that represents the behavior of the emissions without considering public policy interventions (i.e. following the historic trends).
A NDP scenario that is compatible with a goal of net zero emissions by 2050.
The BAU scenario considers that the energy consumption, economic activity and population grow according to the historical trends. This scenario incorporates the electricity generation expansion plan from the Costa Rican Electricity Institute to represent the development of the electricity sector [10]. It also includes a moderate penetration of solar and wind generation, distributed generation for self-consumption, prived electric vehicles and electric public transport (buses). In terms of emissions, this scenario does not have a significant change in relation to the trend trajectory.
The NDP scenario considers that the social and economic situation described in the BAU scenario remains the same. However, they incorporate the political objectives generated through stakeholder engagement and the participatory process. The main strategies in the 2° and 1.5° scenarios are focused in i) urban planning and mobility, ii) switching fossil fuel technologies, and iii) switching energy carriers. Figure 4.1 sumarizes the main aspects of each scenario.
Figure 4.1: Scenarios in OSeMOSYS-CR.¶
The following sections describe how the considerations in Figure 4.1 were introduced in the model.
4.1 Passenger Transport¶
Mode shift between public and private passengers demands: OSeMOSYS-CR uses changes in the levels of activity from private to public transport with a target by 2050. Load factors, distances, and efficiencies are similar to BAU. Figure 4.2 shows how this is incorporated in the model with the Total Technology Annual Activity LowerLimit parameter.
Non-motorized mobility and digitalization: The transition is carried out by a linear reduction of the demand in private and public transport from 2022 to 2050, and an increasing demand of non-motorized mobility. The cost of the infrastructure was embedded with the mode shift. In terms of the digitalization, we do not consider costs due to the existing and growing communication infrastructure of the country. Figure 4.3 presents this changes in the demand from the Specified Annual Demand parameter.
Electrification private and public sectors: Similar to the mode shift, we parametrized an adoption curve considering targets by 2035, and 2050. The procedure consists of introducing a level of activity for low-carbon technologies while the proportions of the other groups of technologies are kept proportional to the base year. Figure 4.4 shows the case of Light-duty electrical vehicles.
4.2 Cargo Transport¶
Demand absorbed by TELCA and Logistic: The TELCA began to absorb demand for heavy freight linearly from 2022 to 2024, in which the electric train reaches a maximum value of 10% through 2050. The logistic actions reduce the light freight demand, and we use the same linear reduction, but with 2022 and 2030 as transition years. Figure 4.5 shows the reduction in the demand. In both cases, the capital cost is introduced linearly in the transition years. Fixed costs also increase in the transition period to the maximum rate, which remains until 2050
Use of LPG: Considering the uncertainty in cargo transport related to low-carbon technologies, the stakeholders consider this as an alternative. It is modelled as a maximum value of activity from 0% to 20% between 2022 and 2050.
Low carbon technologies: Similar to the above, there are no absolute values for the transition. In this context, we use the reference value of emission (in cargo) of 2018 and define a linear constraint of emissions from 2022 to 2050, limiting the emission from 0% to -20% and -70%, according to the scenario. The model optimizes under this constraint. Figure 4.6 shows this limit from the Annual Emission Limit parameter.

Figure 4.6: Cargo Emission Annual Limit . <doc_imgs/CargoEmissionLimit.png
¶
4.3 Electricity and fossil fuels¶
Blend with biofuels: A specific process in the model makes the volumetric mixture of biofuels and fossil fuels, defining percentages of activities. For these cases, it establishes a linear level of activity from 0 to 8% for ethanol and 0 to 10% for biodiesel, between 2022 and 2050. This consideration corresponds to the uncertainty linked to biofuel imports and productions. Here, we consider only imports and comparable prices with fossil fuels.
Renewable electricity: The assumption limits the operation of thermal power plants from 2.5% to 0% between 2022 and 2050.
Efficiency: It is assumed a linear reduction of demands from 0% to 10% between 2022 and 2050 as a response to the increased efficiency in the energy sector.
5. Using OSeMOSYS-CR¶
OSeMOSYS-CR’s repository1, contains the following folders:
0_Model Structure: contains two files that describes the structure of the model.
1_Scenarios_Inputs: contains three folders representing each one of the climatic scenarios (i.e. BAU, SR20, and SR15). Each folder holds 30 individual comma-separated (csv) files with the parameters of the model.
2_Scenarios_Outputs: stores the outputs generated after running the model.
In order to run the model, the following files are needed:
1_csv_to_txt.py: converts the csv files in 1_Scenarios_Inputs into a text (txt) file of the parameters of the model.
2_run_model_mathprog.py: runs the model and generates two wide format file with the results of the model: i) a file containing the original names of the fuels, technologies and emissions, and ii) a file with coded names for an easier understanding.
Running the model, generates the following files, all of them are store in 2_Scenarios_Outputs:
Osemosyscr_data.txt: is the output file of 1_csv_to_txt.py.
Osemosyscr_data_Output.txt: is one of the output files of 2_run_model_mathprog.py. Contains the results of the scenario.
Osemosys_data_Output.csv: is one of the output files of 2_run_model_mathprog.py. Contains the results of the scenario in a wide format csv file.
Osemosys_data_Output_CODED: is one of the output files of 2_run_model_mathprog.py. Contains the results of the scenario in a wide format csv file with coded names for the fuels, technologies and emissions of the model.
Figure 5.1 shows the general framework of how the python modules of OSeMOSYS-CR work. The following are important considerations for using these modules:
In order to run the model, the GLPK2, solver needs to be installed.
Before running the model, 2_Scenarios_Outputs should be empty.
1_csv_to_txt.py and 2_run_model_mathprog.py must be respectively run. In both codes the scenario of interest needs to be specified in the first lines.
Figure 5.1. General Framework of OSeMOSYS-CR¶
References¶
- 1
IDB and DDPLAC. Getting to Net-Zero Emissiones Lessons from LAC. Technical Report, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington D.C, 2019.
- 2
Guido Godínez-Zamora, Luis Victor-Gallardo, Jam Angulo-Paniagua, Eunice Ramos, Mark Howells, Will Usher, Felipe De León, and Jairo Quirós-Tortós. How Modelling Tools Can Support Climate Change Policy: The Case of Costa Rica in the Energy Sector. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2020.
- 3
Jairo Quirós-Tortós, Luis Victor-Gallardo, Guido Godinez-Zamora, Mark Howells, Eunice Pereira, Edmundo Molina, and David Groves. Assessing Options to Decarbonize the Transport Sector under Technological Uncertainty: The Case of Costa Rica. Technical Report, University of Costa Rica, Tecnológico de Monterrey and RAND, 2020.
- 4
SEPSE. Balances Energéticos. 2016. URL: https://sepse.go.cr/ciena/balances-energeticos/.
- 5
IMN. Inventario nacional de gases de efecto invernadero y absorción de carbono. Technical Report, National Meteorological Institute, San José, 2012.
- 6
Mark Howells, Holger Rogner, Neil Strachan, Charles Heaps, Hillard Huntington, Socrates Kypreos, Alison Hughes, Semida Silveira, Joe DeCarolis, Morgan Bazillian, and Alexander Roehrl. Osemosys: the open source energy modeling system: an introduction to its ethos, structure and development. Energy Policy, 39(10):5850 – 5870, 2011. Sustainability of biofuels. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511004897, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033.
- 7
MINAE. Costa Rica’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. Technical Report, Ministry of Enviroment and Energy of Costa Rica, 2015.
- 8
MINAE; MIVAH; MIDEPLAN; BID; GEF; AC&A; Gensler. Plan Integral de Movilidad Urbana Sostenible para el Área Metropolitana de San José, Costa Rica. Technical Report, Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía, Ministerio de Ambiente y Asentamientos Humanos, Ministerio de Planificación y Política Económica, 2017. URL: https://cambioclimatico.go.cr/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PIMUS_INFORME-EJECUTIVO.pdf.
- 9
Deiby Solano Cambronero. Anuario estadístico de accidentes de tránsito con víctimas en Costa Rica. Technical Report, Consejo de Seguridad Vial, 2017. URL: https://www.csv.go.cr/estad%C3%ADsticas.
- 10
ICE. Plan de expansión de la generación 2018-2030. Technical Report, Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad, 2019. URL: https://www.grupoice.com/wps/wcm/connect/f5fd219d-700d-4abc-8422-ecbd27f9c9fd/Informe+Ejecutivo+PEG2018-2034.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=mrl1q1W.
Annexes¶
A1. Fuels¶
The following table shows the fuels included in OSeMOSYS-CR.
Name |
Description |
Group |
---|---|---|
E0BIODSL |
Biodisel imported or produced |
Pre-sources |
E0DSL |
Diesel imported |
Pre-sources |
E0DSLBLEND |
Diesel and biodiseal blend |
Pre-sources |
E0ETHAN |
Ethanol imported or produced |
Pre-sources |
E0GSL |
Gasoline imported |
Pre-sources |
E0GSLBLEND |
Gasoline and ethanol blend |
Pre-sources |
E0LPG |
LPG imported |
Pre-sources |
E0NATGAS |
Natural Gas imported |
Pre-sources |
Name |
Description |
Group |
E1BIO |
Biomass energy |
Sources |
E1DSL |
Diesel |
Sources |
E1FOI |
Fuel Oil |
Sources |
E1FWO |
Firewood |
Sources |
E1GAS |
Gasoline |
Sources |
E1GEO |
Geothermal energy |
Sources |
E1GSL |
Gasoline |
Sources |
E1JEFU |
Jet Fuel |
Sources |
E1LPG |
Liquid Petroleum Gas |
Sources |
E1METH |
Methene |
Sources |
E1PCO |
Petroleum coke |
Sources |
E1SOL |
Solar energy |
Sources |
E1WAT |
Hydraulic energy |
Sources |
E1WIN |
Eolic Energy |
Sources |
E2ELC01 |
Electricity Supply by Plants |
Electricity |
E2HYD |
Hydrogen produced |
Hydrogen |
E3ELC02 |
Electricity for Transmission |
Electricity |
E3ELC03 |
Electricity for Distribution |
Electricity |
E3ELC04 |
Electricity Exports |
Electricity |
E4ELC03AGR |
Agriculture Electricity Demand |
Electricity Demand |
E4ELC03COM |
Commercial Electricity Demand |
Electricity Demand |
E4ELC03IND |
Industrial Electricity Demand |
Electricity Demand |
E4ELC03PUB |
Public Electricity Demand |
Electricity Demand |
E4ELC03RES |
Residential Electricity Demand |
Electricity Demand |
E5BIOIND |
Biomass for Industry |
Final Demand |
E5DSLAGR |
Diesel End Use Agriculture |
Final Demand |
E5DSLIND |
Diesel End Use Industry |
Final Demand |
E5FWCOM |
Firewood End Use Commercial |
Final Demand |
E5FWIND |
Firewood End Use Industry |
Final Demand |
E5FWRES |
Firewood End Use Residential |
Final Demand |
E5LGPCOM |
LGP End Use Commercial |
Final Demand |
E5LPGIND |
LPG End Use Industry |
Final Demand |
E5LPGRES |
LPG End Use Residential |
Final Demand |
E5OFIND |
Fuel Oil End Use Industry |
Final Demand |
E5PCIND |
Petroleum Coke End Use Industry |
Final Demand |
E6TDAIR |
Transport Demand Air |
Final Demand |
E6TDFREHEA |
Transport Demand Freigth Heavy |
Final Demand |
E6TDFRELIG |
Transport Demand Freigth Light |
Final Demand |
E6TDPASPRIV |
Transport Demand Passenger Private |
Final Demand |
E6TDPASSPUB |
Transport Demand Passenger Public |
Final Demand |
E6TDSPE |
Transport Demand Special Equipment & Se |
Final Demand |
E6TRNOMOT |
Transport Demand Passenger No Motorize |
Final Demand |
E6TRRIDSHA |
Transport Demand Passenger Ride Sharing |
Final Demand |
ETFREIGHT |
Cargo demand |
Final Demand |
ETPASSENGER |
Passanger demand |
Final Demand |
E7DSL_Ag |
Diesel for agriculture |
Monitor_Agriculture |
E7ELE_Ag |
Electricity for Agriculture |
Monitor_Agriculture |
E7ELE_Co |
Electricity for Commerce |
Monitor_Commerce |
E7ELE_Pb |
Electricity for public service |
Monitor_Commerce |
E7FWO_Co |
Wood for commerce |
Monitor_Commerce |
E7LPG_Co |
LPG for commerce |
Monitor_Commerce |
E7DSL_HF |
Diesel for light heavy transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7DSL_LF |
Diesel for light freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7ELE_HF |
Electricity for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7ELE_LF |
Electricity for light freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7GSL_LF |
Gasoline for light freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7HYD_HF |
Hydrogen for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7LPG_HF |
LPG for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7LPG_LF |
LPG for light freight transport |
Monitor_FrieghtTransport |
E7BAG_In |
Baggase for Industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7BIO_In |
Biomass for Industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7COK_In |
Coke for Industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7DSL_In |
Diesel for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7ELE_Ind |
Electricity for Industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7FOI_In |
Fuel Oil for Industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7FWO_In |
Wood for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7LPG_In |
LPG for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
E7BIO_El |
Biomass for electricity |
Monitor_Other |
E7DSL_El |
Diesel for electricity |
Monitor_Other |
E7DSL_Eq |
Diesel for special equipment |
Monitor_Other |
E7FOI_El |
Fuel oil for electricity |
Monitor_Other |
E7JFU_Ai |
Jet fuel for aircraft |
Monitor_Other |
E7DSL_Pr |
Diesel for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
E7ELE_Pr |
Electricity for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
E7GSL_Pr |
Gasoline for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
E7LPG_Pr |
LPG for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
E7DSL_Pu |
Diesel for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
E7ELE_Pu |
Electricity for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
E7GSL_Pu |
Gasoline for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
E7HYD_Pu |
Hydrogen for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
E7LPG_Pu |
LPG for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
E7ELE_Re |
Electricity for Commerce |
Monitor_Residencial |
E7FWO_Re |
Wood for residential |
Monitor_Residencial |
E7LPG_Re |
LPG for residential |
Monitor_Residencial |
E8Fossil_HF |
Demand Fossil Fuel Heavy Freight |
Transport_Demands |
E8Fossil_LF |
Demand Fossil Fuel Light Freight |
Transport_Demands |
E8Fossil_pri |
Demand Fossil Fuel Private |
Transport_Demands |
E8Fossil_pu |
Demand Fossil Fuel Public |
Transport_Demands |
E8Fossil_RS |
Demand Fossil Fuel RideSharing |
Transport_Demands |
E8LowCO2_HF |
Demand Low Carbon Heavy Freight |
Transport_Demands |
E8LowCO2_LF |
Demand Low Carbon Light Freight |
Transport_Demands |
E8LowCO2_pr |
Demand Low Carbon Private |
Transport_Demands |
E8LowCO2_pu |
Demand Low Carbon Public |
Transport_Demands |
E8LowCO2_RS |
Demand Low Carbon RideSharing |
Transport_Demands |
E8NoMotor_B |
Demand No motorize Bikes |
Transport_Demands |
E8NoMotor_W |
Demand No motorize walk |
Transport_Demands |
E9ELESTOR_HF |
Electricity storage for heavy freight |
Storage |
E9ELESTOR_LF |
Electricity storage for light freight |
Storage |
E9ELESTOR_Pr |
Electricity storage for private vehicle |
Storage |
E9ELESTOR_Pu |
Electricity storage for public transpor |
Storage |
E9ELESTORAGE |
Electricity storage |
Storage |
HYDROGEN |
Hydrogen |
Storage |
E7BIKEWAYS |
Bikeways infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TIBIKEWAYS |
Bikeways infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TIRAILS |
Rails infrastructerestrucre |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TIROADS |
Roads infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TISIDEWALKS |
Sidewalks infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
E7BIKEWAYS |
Bikeways infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TIBIKEWAYS |
Bikeways infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TIRAILS |
Rails infrastructerestrucre |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TIROADS |
Roads infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
TISIDEWALKS |
Sidewalks infrastructure |
Transport_Infraestructre |
A2. Technologies¶
The following table shows the technologies included in OSeMOSYS-CR.
Name |
Description |
Group |
---|---|---|
BACKSTOP_PS |
Backup Power Systems |
Backup |
BACKSTOP_TS |
Backup Transport Sector |
Backup |
BLENDDSL |
Blend Diesel |
Primary Sources |
BLENDGAS |
Blend Gasoline |
Primary Sources |
DIST_DSL |
Distribution Diesel |
Primary Sources |
DIST_GSL |
Distribution Gasoline |
Primary Sources |
DIST_LPG |
Distribution LPG |
Primary Sources |
DIST_NG |
Distribution Natural Gas |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPBIODSL |
Importing biodiesel |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPDSL |
Importing Diesel |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPETHAN |
Importing ethanol |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPGAS |
Importing Gasoline |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPJEFU |
Importing Jet Fuel |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPLPG |
Importing LPG |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPNG |
Importing Natural Gas |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPOIFU |
Importing Oil Fuel |
Primary Sources |
ESIMPPCO |
Importing Petroleum Coke |
Primary Sources |
ESPROBIODSL |
Production biodiesel |
Primary Sources |
ESPROBIOGAS |
Production biogas |
Primary Sources |
ESPROETHAN |
Production ethanol |
Primary Sources |
ESRNBIO |
Biomass Resources |
Primary Sources |
ESRNFW |
Fire wood Resources |
Primary Sources |
ESRNGEO |
Renewable Resource Geothermal |
Primary Sources |
ESRNSUN |
Renewable Resource Solar |
Primary Sources |
ESRNWAT |
Renewable Resource Water |
Primary Sources |
ESRNWND |
Renewable Resource Wind |
Primary Sources |
ESROMBIO |
Organic Material Resources |
Primary Sources |
PPBIO001 |
Biomass Power Plant (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPBIO002 |
Biomass Power Plant (new) |
Power Plants |
PPDSL001 |
Diesel Power Plant (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPDSL002 |
Diesel Power Plant (new) |
Power Plants |
PPFOB001 |
Oil Power Plant (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPFOB002 |
Oil Power Plant (new) |
Power Plants |
PPGEO001 |
Geothermal Power Plant (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPGEO002 |
Geothermal Power Plant (new) |
Power Plants |
PPHDAM001 |
Hydro Dam Power Plant (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPHDAM002 |
Hydro Dam Power Plant (new) |
Power Plants |
PPHROR001 |
Hydro Run of River Power Plant (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPHROR002 |
Hydro Run of River Power Plant (new) |
Power Plants |
PPPVD001 |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Distribution (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPPVD002 |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Distribution (new) |
Power Plants |
PPPVT001 |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Transmission (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPPVT002 |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Transmission (new) |
Power Plants |
PPWND001 |
Wind Power Plant Distribution (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPWND002 |
Wind Power Plant Distribution (new) |
Power Plants |
PPWNT001 |
Wind Power Plant Transmission (existing) |
Power Plants |
PPWNT002 |
Wind Power Plant Transmission (new) |
Power Plants |
EDDISTAGR |
Electric Power Distribution for Agriculture |
Electricity Distribution |
EDDISTCOM |
Electric Power Distribution for Commercial |
Electricity Distribution |
EDDISTIND |
Electric Power Distribution for Industry |
Electricity Distribution |
EDDISTPUB |
Electric Power Distribution for Public |
Electricity Distribution |
EDDISTRES |
Electric Power Distribution for Residential |
Electricity Distribution |
EDEBIOIND |
Biomass Distribution Industry |
Energy Distribution |
EDEDSLAGR |
Diesel Distribution Agriculture |
Energy Distribution |
EDEDSLIND |
Diesel Distribution Industry |
Energy Distribution |
EDEFOIND |
Fuel Oil Distribution Industry |
Energy Distribution |
EDEFWCOM |
Firewood Distribution Commercial |
Energy Distribution |
EDEFWIND |
Firewood Distribution Industry |
Energy Distribution |
EDEFWRES |
Firewood Distribution Residential |
Energy Distribution |
EDEJFUAIR |
Jet fuel oil Distribution air |
Energy Distribution |
EDELGPCOM |
LGP Distribution Commercial |
Energy Distribution |
EDELPGIND |
LPG Distribution Industry |
Energy Distribution |
EDELPGRES |
LPG Distribution Residential |
Energy Distribution |
EDEPCIND |
Petroleum Coke Distribution Industry |
Energy Distribution |
DDSL_Ag |
Diesel for agriculture |
Monitor_Agriculture |
DELE_Ag |
Electricity for agriculture |
Monitor_Agriculture |
DELE_Co |
Electricity for commerce |
Monitor_Commerce |
DELE_Pb |
Electricity for public service |
Monitor_Commerce |
DFWO_Co |
Wood for commerce |
Monitor_Commerce |
DLPG_Co |
LPG for commerce |
Monitor_Commerce |
DDSL_HF |
Diesel for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DDSL_LF |
Diesel for light freigth transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DELE_HF |
Electricity for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DELE_LF |
Electricity for light freigth transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DGSL_LF |
Gasoline for light freigth transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DHYD_HF |
Hydrogen for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DLPG_HF |
LPG for heavy freight transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DLPG_LF |
LPG for light freight transport |
Monitor_FreightTransport |
DBIO_In |
Biomass for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DCOK_In |
Coke for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DDSL_In |
Diesel for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DELE_In |
Electricity for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DFOI_in |
Fuel Oil for Industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DFWO_In |
Wood for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DLPG_In |
LPG for industry |
Monitor_Industry |
DBIO_El |
Biomass for electricity |
Monitor_Others |
DDSL_El |
Diesel for electricity |
Monitor_Others |
DDSL_Eq |
Diesel for equipment |
Monitor_Others |
DFOI_El |
Fuel Oil for Electricity |
Monitor_Others |
DJEFU_Ai |
Jet fuel air craft |
Monitor_Others |
DDSL_Pr |
Diesel for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
DELE_Pr |
Electricity for Private Transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
DGSL_Pr |
Gasoline for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
DLPG_Pr |
LPG for private transport |
Monitor_PrivateTransport |
DDSL_Pu |
Diesel for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
DELE_Pu |
Electricity for Public Transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
DGSL_Pu |
Gasoline for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
DHYD_Pu |
Hydrogen for heavy public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
DLPG_Pu |
LPG for public transport |
Monitor_PublicTransport |
DELE_Re |
Electricity for residencial |
Monitor_Residential |
DFWO_Re |
Wood for residential |
Monitor_Residential |
DLPG_Re |
LPG for residential |
Monitor_Residential |
TRFWDDSL01 |
Four-Wheel-Drive (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDDSL02 |
Four-Wheel-Drive Diesel (new) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDELE02 |
Four-Wheel-Drive Electric (new) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDGAS01 |
Four-Wheel-Drive Gasoline (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDGAS02 |
Four-Wheel-Drive Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDHYBD02 |
Four-Wheel-Drive Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDLPG01 |
Four-Wheel-Drive LPG (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDLPG02 |
Four-Wheel-Drive LPG (new) |
Private Transport |
TRFWDPHYBD02 |
Four-Wheel-Drive Plug-in Hybrid Electric-Diesel(new) |
Private Transport |
TRLDDSL01 |
Light Duty Diesel (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRLDDSL02 |
Light Duty Diesel (new) |
Private Transport |
TRLDELE02 |
Light Duty Electric (new) |
Private Transport |
TRLDGAS01 |
Light Duty Gasoline (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRLDGAS02 |
Light Duty Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRLDHYBG02 |
Light Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRLDPHYBG02 |
Light Plug-in Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVDSL01 |
Minivan Diesel (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVDSL02 |
Minivan Diesel (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVELE02 |
Minivan Electric (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVGAS01 |
Minivan Gasoline (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVGAS02 |
Minivan Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVHYBD02 |
Minivan Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVHYBG02 |
Minivan Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVLPG01 |
Minivan LPG (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRMIVLPG02 |
Minivan LPG (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMOTELC02 |
Motorcycle electric (new) |
Private Transport |
TRMOTGAS01 |
Motorcycle Gasoline (existing) |
Private Transport |
TRMOTGAS02 |
Motorcycle Gasoline (new) |
Private Transport |
TRBUSDSL01 |
Bus Diesel (existing) |
Public Transport |
TRBUSDSL02 |
Bus Diesel (new) |
Public Transport |
TRBUSELC02 |
Bus Electric (new) |
Public Transport |
TRBUSHYBD02 |
Bus Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Public Transport |
TRBUSHYD02 |
Bus Hydrogen (new) |
Public Transport |
TRBUSLPG02 |
Bus LPG (new) |
Public Transport |
TRMBUSDSL01 |
Microbus Diesel (existing) |
Public Transport |
TRMBUSDSL02 |
Microbus Diesel (new) |
Public Transport |
TRMBUSELE02 |
Microbus Electric (new) |
Public Transport |
TRMBUSHYBD02 |
Microbus Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Public Transport |
TRMBUSHYD02 |
Microbus Hydrogen (new) |
Public Transport |
TRMBUSLPG02 |
Microbus LPG (new) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXDSL01 |
Taxi Diesel (existing) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXDSL02 |
Taxi Diesel (new) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXELC02 |
Taxi Electric (new) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXGAS01 |
Taxi Gasoline (existing) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXGAS02 |
Taxi Gasoline (new) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXHYBD02 |
Taxi Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXHYBG02 |
Taxi Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXLPG01 |
Taxi LPG (existing) |
Public Transport |
TRTAXLPG02 |
Taxi LPG (new) |
Public Transport |
TRYLFDSL01 |
Mini Trucks (existing) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFDSL02 |
Mini Trucks Diesel (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFELE02 |
Mini Trucks Electric (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFGAS01 |
Mini Trucks Gasoline (existing) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFGAS02 |
Mini Trucks Gasoline (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFHYBD02 |
Mini Trucks Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFHYBG02 |
Mini Trucks Electric-Gasoline (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFLPG01 |
Mini Trucks LPG (existing) |
Freight Transport |
TRYLFLPG02 |
Mini Trucks LPG (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYTKDSL01 |
Trucks Diesel (existing) |
Freight Transport |
TRYTKDSL02 |
Trucks Diesel (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYTKELC02 |
Trucks Electric (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYTKHYBD02 |
Trucks Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYTKHYD02 |
Trucks Hydrogen (new) |
Freight Transport |
TRYTKLPG02 |
Trucks LPG (new) |
Freight Transport |
DIST_HYD |
Distribution Hydrogen |
Hydrogen |
PROD_HYD_CH4 |
Production hydrogen CH4 |
Hydrogen |
PROD_HYD_H20 |
Production hydrogen H2O |
Hydrogen |
TRANOMOTBike |
No motorized transport bikes |
No Motorized Transport |
TRANOMOTWalk |
No motorized transport bikes |
No Motorized Transport |
TRXTRAINDSL01 |
Train Diesel (existing) |
Railroad |
TRXTRAINDSL02 |
Train Diesel (new) |
Railroad |
TRXTRAINELC02 |
Train Electric (new) |
Railroad |
TRZAIR001 |
Air (existing) |
Special Transport |
TRZSEQ001 |
Special Equipment & Sea (existing) |
Special Transport |
TDDIST01 |
Electricity Distribution (existing) |
T&D Systems |
TDDIST02 |
Electricity Distribution (new) |
T&D Systems |
TDMEREL01 |
Imports of electricity |
T&D Systems |
TDMEREL02 |
Exports of electricity |
T&D Systems |
TDTRANS01 |
Electricity Transmission (existing) |
T&D Systems |
TDTRANS02 |
Electricity Transmission (new) |
T&D Systems |
DTRFF_hf |
Transport distribution demand fossil fuel heavy cargo |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRFF_lf |
Transport distribution demand fossil fuel light cargo |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRFF_pr |
Transport distribution demand fossil fuel private |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRFF_pu |
Transport distribution demand fossil fuel public |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRFF_rs |
Transport distribution demand fossil fuel ride sharing |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRLC_hf |
Transport distribution demand Low carbon heavy cargo |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRLC_lf |
Transport distribution demand Low carbon light cargo |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRLC_pr |
Transport distribution demand Low carbon private |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRLC_pu |
Transport distribution demand Low carbon public |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRLC_rs |
Transport distribution demand Low carbon ride sharing |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRNM_Bk |
Transport distribution demand Bikes |
Transport_Distribution |
DTRNM_Wk |
Transport distribution demand Walks |
Transport_Distribution |
TI_BW_01 |
Bikeway (existing) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_BW_02 |
Bikeway (new) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_RaRo_01 |
Railroad (existing) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_RaRo_02 |
Railroad (new) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_RoNet_01 |
Road network (existing) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_RoNet_02 |
Road network (new) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_SW_01 |
Sidewalk (existing) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
TI_SW_02 |
Sidewalk (new) |
Transport_Infraestructure |
Power Plants¶
Biomass Power Plant (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPBIO001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Biomass Power Plant (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.317 |
0.317 |
0.317 |
0.317 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.317 |
0.317 |
0.317 |
0.317 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPBIO001, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.317% (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPBIO001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for PPBIO001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=25 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPBIO001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (4)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Residual Capacity for PPBIO001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.03 [GW] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPBIO001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.03 [GW] (6)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Variable Cost for PPBIO001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (7)
Biomass Power Plant (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPBIO002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Biomass Power Plant (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.317 |
0.317 |
0.317 |
0.317 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
2463.28 |
2463.28 |
2463.28 |
2463.28 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0 |
0.0115 |
0.0308 |
0.05 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPBIO002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.75% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Capital Cost for PPBIO002, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2463.28 [M$/GW] (2)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Fixed Cost for PPBIO002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPBIO002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=25 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPBIO002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPBIO002, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPBIO002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPBIO002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Diesel Power Plant (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPDSL001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Diesel Power Plant (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel) |
PJ/PJ |
2.85 |
2.85 |
2.85 |
2.85 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.381 |
0.381 |
0.381 |
0.381 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.381 |
0.381 |
0.381 |
0.381 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPDSL001, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.034% (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPDSL001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPDSL001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel.
InputActivityRatio=2.85 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPDSL001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=30 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPDSL001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Residual Capacity for PPDSL001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.381 [GW] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPDSL001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.381 [GW] (7)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Variable Cost for PPDSL001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=1.3 [M%/PJ] (8)
Diesel Power Plant (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPDSL002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Diesel Power Plant (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
1269.78 |
1269.78 |
1269.78 |
1269.78 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel) |
PJ/PJ |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPDSL002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.034% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Capital Cost for PPDSL002, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1269.78 [M$/GW] (2)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Fixed Cost for PPDSL002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (3)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPDSL002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel.
InputActivityRatio=2.5 [PJ/PJ] (4)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for PPDSL002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=30 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPDSL002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (6)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Variable Cost for PPDSL002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=1.3 [M$/PJ] (7)
Oil Power Plant (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPFOB001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Oil Power Plant (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Fuel Oil) |
PJ/PJ |
2.85 |
2.85 |
2.85 |
2.85 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.214 |
0.214 |
0.214 |
0.214 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.214 |
0.214 |
0.214 |
0.214 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPFOB001, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.034% (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPFOB001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPFOB001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Fuel Oil.
InputActivityRatio=2.85 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPFOB001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=30 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPFOB001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Residual Capacity for PPFOB001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.214 [GW] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPFOB001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.214 [GW] (7)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Variable Cost for PPFOB001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=1.3 [M$/PJ] (8)
Oil Power Plant (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPFOB002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Oil Power Plant (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
0.034 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
4650.33 |
4650.33 |
4650.33 |
4650.33 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Fuel Oil) |
PJ/PJ |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPFOB002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.034% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Capital Cost for PPFOB002, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=4650.33 [M$/GW] (2)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Fixed Cost for PPFOB002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (3)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPFOB002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Fuel Oil.
InputActivityRatio=2.5 [PJ/PJ] (4)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for PPFOB002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=30 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPFOB002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (6)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Variable Cost for PPFOB002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=1.3 [M$/PJ] (7)
Geothermal Power Plant (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPGEO001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Geothermal Power Plant (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.634 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.634 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Geothermal energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.206 |
0.206 |
0.206 |
0.206 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.206 |
0.206 |
0.206 |
0.206 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPGEO001, for every scenario and season.

Figure 1) Capacity Factor for PPGEO001.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Fixed Cost for PPGEO001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPGEO001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Geothermal Energy.
InputActivityRatio=2.85 [PJ/PJ] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for PPGEO001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=40 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPGEO001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (4)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Residual Capacity for PPGEO001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.206 [GW] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPGEO001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.206 [GW] (6)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Variable Cost for PPGEO001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (7)
Geothermal Power Plant (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPGEO002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Geothermal Power Plant (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.634 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.634 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
7828.28 |
7828.28 |
7828.28 |
7828.28 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Geothermal energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.5 |
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y] |
GW |
0 |
0.055 |
0 |
0 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capacity Factor for PPGEO002, for every scenario and season.

Figure 1) Capacity Factor for PPGEO002.¶
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for PPGEO002, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=7828.28 [M$/GW] (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPGEO002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=44.5 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPGEO002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Geothermal Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPGEO002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=40 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPGEO002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPGEO002, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPGEO002.¶
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 show the Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPGEO002, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPGEO002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPGEO002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Hydro Dam Power Plant (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPHDAM001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Hydro Dam Power Plant (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.4374 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.4374 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydraulic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
1.13 |
1.13 |
1.13 |
1.13 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
1.13 |
1.13 |
1.13 |
1.13 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capacity Factor for PPHDAM001, for every scenario and season.

Figure 1) Capacity Factor for PPHDAM001.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Fixed Cost for PPHDAM001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=47.9 [M$/GW] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPHDAM001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydraulic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=2.85 [PJ/PJ] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for PPHDAM001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=80 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPHDAM001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (4)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Residual Capacity for PPHDAM001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=1.13 [GW] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPHDAM001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=1.13 [GW] (6)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Variable Cost for PPHDAM001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (7)
Hydro Dam Power Plant (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPHDAM002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Hydro Dam Power Plant (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.4374 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.4374 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
8241.97 |
8241.97 |
8241.97 |
8241.97 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydraulic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capacity Factor for PPHDAM002, for every scenario and season.

Figure 1) Capacity Factor for PPHDAM002.¶
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for PPHDAM002, para todos los escenarios.
CapitalCost=8241.97 [M$/GW] (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPHDAM002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=47.9 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPHDAM002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydraulic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPHDAM002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=80 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPHDAM002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPHROR002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Hydro Run of River Power Plant (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPHROR001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Hydro Run of River Power Plant (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.4966 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.4966 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydraulic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
1.21 |
1.21 |
1.21 |
1.21 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
1.21 |
1.21 |
1.21 |
1.21 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capacity Factor for PPHROR001, for every scenario and season.

Figure 1) Capacity Factor for PPHROR001.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Fixed Cost for PPHROR001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=47.9 [M$/GW] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPHROR001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydraulic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for PPHROR001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=60 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPHROR001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (4)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Residual Capacity for PPHROR001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=1.21 [GW] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPHROR001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=1.21 [GW] (6)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Variable Cost for PPHROR001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (7)
Hydro Run of River Power Plant (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPHROR002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Hydro Run of River Power Plant (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.4966 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.4966 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
4385.15 |
4385.15 |
4385.15 |
4385.15 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydraulic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.14 |
0.2 |
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.019 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capacity Factor for PPHROR002, for every scenario and season.

Figure 1) Capacity Factor for PPHROR002.¶
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for PPHROR002, para todos los escenarios.
CapitalCost=4385.15 [M$/GW] (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPHROR002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=47.9 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPHROR002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydraulic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPHROR002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=60 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPHROR002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPHROR002, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPHROR002.¶
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPHROR002, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPHROR002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPHROR002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Photovoltaic Power Plant Distribution (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPPVD002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Distribution (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
1784.5 |
1553.5 |
1553.5 |
1553.5 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Solar energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity For Transmission) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.1 |
0.3 |
1.659 |
3 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPPVD002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.227% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for PPPVD002, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for PPPVD002.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPPVD002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=15.6 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPPVD002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Solar Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPPVD002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=20 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPPVD002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for Transmission.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPPVD002, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPPVD002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPPVD002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Photovoltaic Power Plant Transmission (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPPVT001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Transmission (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.277 |
0.277 |
0.277 |
0.277 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.277 |
0.277 |
0.277 |
0.277 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
31.3 |
31.3 |
31.3 |
31.3 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Solar energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.0054 |
0.0054 |
0.0054 |
0.0054 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.0054 |
0.0054 |
0.0054 |
0.0054 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPPVT001, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.277% (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPPVT001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=31.3 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPPVT001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Solar Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPPVT001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=25 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPPVT001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Residual Capacity for PPPVT001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.0054 [GW] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPPVT001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.0054 [GW] (7)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Variable Cost for PPPVT001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (8)
Photovoltaic Power Plant Transmission (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPPVT002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Photovoltaic Power Plant Transmission (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
0.227 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
2484.5 |
2253.5 |
2253.5 |
2253.5 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
31.3 |
31.3 |
31.3 |
31.3 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Solar energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y] |
GW |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPPVT002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.227% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for PPPVT002, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for PPPVT002.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPPVT002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=31.3 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPPVT002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Solar Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPPVT002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=25 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPPVT002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPPVT002, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPPVT002.¶
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 show the Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPPVT002, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPPVT002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPPVT002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Wind Power Plant Distribution (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPWND002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Wind Power Plant Distribution (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
2384.5 |
2153.5 |
2153.5 |
2153.5 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
179.1 |
179.1 |
179.1 |
179.1 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Eolic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity For Transmission) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.075 |
0.225 |
0.375 |
0.525 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPWND002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.572% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for PPWND002, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for PPWND002.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPWND002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=179.1 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPWND002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Eolic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPWND002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=20 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPWND002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for Transmission.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPWND002, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPWND002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPWND002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Wind Power Plant Transmission (existing)¶
Set codification: |
PPWNT001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Wind Power Plant Transmission (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
179.1 |
179.1 |
179.1 |
179.1 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Eolic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPWNT001, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.572% (1)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPWNT001, for every scenario.
FixedCost=179.1 [M$/GW] (2)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPWNT001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Eolic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPWNT001, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=25 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPWNT001, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Residual Capacity for PPWNT001, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.39 [GW] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPWNT001, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.39 [GW] (7)
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Variable Cost for PPWNT001, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (8)
Wind Power Plant Transmission (new)¶
Set codification: |
PPWNT002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Wind Power Plant Transmission (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Dry) |
% |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y] (Rain) |
% |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
0.572 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
2584.5 |
2353.5 |
2353.5 |
2353.5 |
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/GW |
179.1 |
179.1 |
179.1 |
179.1 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Eolic energy) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity Supply by Plants) |
PJ/PJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
GW |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.65 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y] |
GW |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
VariableCost[r,t,m,y] |
M$/PJ |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
CapacityFactor[r,t,l,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capacity Factor for PPWNT002, for every scenario and season.
CapacityFactor=0.572% (1)
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for PPWNT002, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for PPWNT002.¶
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Fixed Cost for PPWNT002, for every scenario.
FixedCost=179.1 [M$/GW] (2)
.
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Input Activity Ratio for PPWNT002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Eolic Energy.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (3)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (4) shows the Operational Life for PPWNT002, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=25 Years (4)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Output Activity Ratio for PPWNT002, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity Supply by Plants.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/PJ] (5)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for PPWNT002, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for PPWNT002.¶
TotalAnnualMinCapacityInvestment[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPWNT002, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Min Capacity Investment for PPWNT002.¶
VariableCost[r,t,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Variable Cost for PPWNT002, for every scenario.
VariableCost=0.001 [M$/PJ] (6)
Four Wheel Drives¶
Four Wheel Drive (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_4WD |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four Wheel Drive |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Private) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
5.1587 |
6.5541 |
7.9513 |
9.3417 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
5.1582 |
6.3674 |
5.5055 |
5.963 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
5.1484 |
6.541 |
7.9354 |
9.3231 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
5.1491 |
6.3539 |
5.4939 |
5.9237 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_4WD, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_4WD, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_4WD, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_4WD, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Private.
OutputActivityRatio=1.6 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_4WD, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_4WD for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_4WD, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_4WD for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_4WD, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_4WD for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_4WD, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_4WD for the NDP scenario.¶
Four-Wheel-Drive (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
3.3735 |
3.2005 |
3.114 |
3.114 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
1.267 |
0.5365 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
1.267 |
0.4467 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
1.267 |
0.5365 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
1.267 |
0.4467 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
1.2645 |
0.5355 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
1.2645 |
0.4459 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL01 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRFWDDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRFWDDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Residual Capacity for TRFWDDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Residual Capacity for TRFWDDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 7 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 7) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=11244.7188 [$] (8)
Four-Wheel-Drive Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2460.82 |
2460.82 |
2460.82 |
2460.82 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.916285714 |
2.520857143 |
2.125428571 |
1.73 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.4215 |
1.6065 |
2.2089 |
2.5951 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.4215 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
36353.6939 |
36353.6939 |
36353.6939 |
36353.6939 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2460.82 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=171.78 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=36353.6939 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (10)
Four-Wheel-Drive Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDELE02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
4482.01 |
3410.22 |
3328.38 |
3246.53 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
20.3445 |
20.3445 |
20.3445 |
20.3445 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.1325 |
0.467 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.433 |
3.8402 |
5.5831 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.1322 |
0.4661 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.4321 |
3.8322 |
5.5712 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
66212.7337 |
50379.1801 |
49170.1577 |
47960.9877 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
300.5493 |
300.5493 |
300.5493 |
300.5493 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRFWDELE02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=20.3445 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.7 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 6) Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDELE02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDELE02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=300.5493 [$] (8)
Four-Wheel-Drive Gasoline (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDGAS01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive Gasoline (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.808 |
2.664 |
2.592 |
2.592 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.5595 |
1.0839 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.5595 |
0.9025 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.5595 |
1.0839 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.5595 |
0.9025 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.5544 |
1.0818 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.5544 |
0.9007 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS01 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRFWDGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRFWDGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Residual Capacity for TRFWDGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Residual Capacity for TRFWDGAS01 for the NDP scenarios.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 7 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 7) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDGAS01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (7)
Four-Wheel-Drive Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDGAS02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2350.33 |
2350.33 |
2350.33 |
2350.33 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.243428571 |
2.122285714 |
2.001142857 |
1.88 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.8514 |
3.2454 |
4.4622 |
5.2426 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.8514 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
34721.4251 |
34721.4251 |
34721.4251 |
34721.4251 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2350.33 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=34721.4251 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (9)
Four-Wheel-Drive Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3459 |
3459 |
3459 |
3459 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
51099.807 |
51099.807 |
51099.807 |
51099.807 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3459 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=30.825 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.55 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=51099.807 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=455.3777 [$] (10)
Four-Wheel-Drive LPG (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDLPG01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive LPG (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LPG for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
4.51 |
4.51 |
4.51 |
4.51 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.0423 |
0.0179 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP and OP15C) |
Gvkm |
2.5595 |
0.0149 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.0423 |
0.0179 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP and OP15C) |
Gvkm |
2.5595 |
0.0149 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.0422 |
0.0179 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP and OP15C) |
Gvkm |
2.5544 |
0.0149 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=4.51 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRFWDLPG01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRFWDLPG01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRFWDLPG01, for the NDP and OP15C scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRFWDLPG01 for the NDP and OP15C scenarios.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDLPG01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDLPG01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDLPG01, for the NDP and OP15C scenarios.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDLPG01 for the NDP and OP15C scenarios.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDLPG01, for BAU scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDLPG01 for BAU scenario.¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDLPG01, for NDP and OP15C scenarios.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDLPG01 for NDP and OP15C scenarios.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDLPG01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (8)
Four-Wheel-Drive LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3444 |
3444 |
3444 |
3444 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LGP for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.98 |
1.98 |
1.98 |
1.98 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
50878.212 |
50878.212 |
50878.212 |
50878.212 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3444 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=1.98 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRFWDLPG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=50878.212 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (10)
Four-Wheel-Drive Plug-in Hybrid Electric-Diesel(new)¶
Set codification: |
TRFWDPHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Four-Wheel-Drive Plug-in Hybrid Electric-Diesel(new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3286 |
2914 |
2886 |
2857 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.48 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.48 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
48544.078 |
43048.522 |
42634.878 |
42206.461 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRFWDPHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=30.825 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.48 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRFWDPHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Unit Capital Cost for TRFWDPHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRFWDPHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=455.3777 [$] (8)
Buses¶
Bus (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_Bus |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Public) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
25.66 |
25.66 |
25.66 |
25.66 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.5444 |
0.6712 |
0.7994 |
0.9298 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.5444 |
0.6829 |
1.0431 |
1.2542 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.5433 |
0.6699 |
0.7978 |
0.9279 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.5433 |
0.6816 |
1.041 |
1.2517 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_Bus, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_Bus, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Bus.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_Bus, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_Bus, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Public.
OutputActivityRatio=25.66 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Bus, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Bus for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Bus, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Bus for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Bus, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Bus for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Bus, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Bus for the NDP scenario.¶
Bus Diesel (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRBUSDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus Diesel (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
171.78 |
171.78 |
171.78 |
171.78 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
8.62 |
8.62 |
8.62 |
8.62 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.4083 |
0.1678 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.4083 |
0.2044 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.4083 |
0.1678 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.4083 |
0.2044 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.4074 |
0.1674 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.4074 |
0.204 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
11244.7188 |
11244.7188 |
11244.7188 |
11244.7188 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.06 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=171.78 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=8.62 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Buses.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRBUSDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRBUSDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRBUSDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRBUSDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=11244.7188 [$] (9)
Bus Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRBUSDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3399 |
3399 |
3399 |
3399 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
171.78 |
171.78 |
171.78 |
171.78 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
7.61 |
7.61 |
7.61 |
7.61 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1358 |
0.5024 |
0.7978 |
0.9279 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1358 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
222498.54 |
222498.54 |
222498.54 |
222498.54 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
11244.7188 |
11244.7188 |
11244.7188 |
11244.7188 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3399 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.06 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=171.78 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=7.61 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (8) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (8)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Buses.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (9)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=222495.54 [$] (10)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (11) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=11244.7188 [$] (11)
Bus Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRBUSELC02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
5936 |
4517 |
4408 |
4300 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
56.6874 |
56.6874 |
56.6874 |
56.6874 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
4.79 |
4.79 |
4.79 |
4.79 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.051 |
0.6698 |
1.0554 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0509 |
0.6684 |
1.0533 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
388570.56 |
295682.82 |
288547.68 |
281478 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
3710.7572 |
3710.7572 |
3710.7572 |
3710.7572 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRBUSELC02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (1)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=56.6874 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=4.79 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Buses.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSELC02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSELC02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario.

Figure 5) Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSELC02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRBUSELC02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=3710.7572 [$] (8)
Bus Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRBUSHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
5012.67 |
3814.39 |
3722.35 |
3631.15 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
85.89 |
85.89 |
85.89 |
85.89 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.91 |
2.91 |
2.91 |
2.91 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.91 |
2.91 |
2.91 |
2.91 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
328129.3782 |
249689.9694 |
243665.031 |
237695.079 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
5622.3594 |
5622.3594 |
5622.3594 |
5622.3594 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRBUSHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.03 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=85.89 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=4.79 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Buses.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=3710.7572 [$] (9)
Bus Hydrogen (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRBUSHYD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus Hydrogen (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
12588 |
11795 |
11001 |
10208 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
56.6874 |
56.6874 |
56.6874 |
56.6874 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydrogen for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
5.45 |
5.45 |
5.45 |
5.45 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0045 |
0.0754 |
0.1239 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
824010.48 |
772100.7 |
720125.46 |
668215.68 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
3710.7572 |
3710.7572 |
3710.7572 |
3710.7572 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRBUSHYD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=56.6874 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydrogen for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=5.45 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Buses.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSHYD02 for every scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSHYD02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRBUSHYD02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 4) Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSHYD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=3710.7572 [$] (8)
Bus LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRBUSLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Bus LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3755 |
3755 |
3755 |
3755 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
65460 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
100.77 |
100.77 |
100.77 |
100.77 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LPG for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
9.92 |
9.92 |
9.92 |
9.92 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Buses) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
245802.3 |
245802.3 |
245802.3 |
245802.3 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
6596.4042 |
6596.4042 |
6596.4042 |
6596.4042 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3755 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=65460 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.03 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=100.77 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=9.92 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (8) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (8)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Buses.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (9)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRBUSLPG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (11) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=245802.3 [$] (11)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (12) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=6596.4042 [$] (12)
Light Duty Vehicles¶
Light Duty (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_LD |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Duty |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Bus) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Public) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
11.505 |
13.934 |
16.6408 |
19.5691 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
11.5057 |
13.5359 |
11.5218 |
12.4342 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
11.482 |
13.9062 |
16.6076 |
19.53 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
11.4825 |
13.5072 |
11.499 |
12.4097 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_LD, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_LD, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_LD, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_LD, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Private.
OutputActivityRatio=1.5 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_LD, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_LD for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_LD, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_LD for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_LD, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_LD for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_LD, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_LD for the NDP scenario.¶
Light Duty Diesel (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Duty Diesel (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.1945 |
1.9635 |
1.848 |
1.848 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Light Duty) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3022 |
0.122 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3022 |
0.1015 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3022 |
0.122 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3022 |
0.1015 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3016 |
0.1217 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3016 |
0.1013 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL01 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRLDDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRLDDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Residual Capacity for TRLDDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Residual Capacity for TRLDDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 7 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 7) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=728.6044 [$] (8)
Light Duty Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Duty Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1239.09 |
1239.09 |
1239.09 |
1239.09 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.748285714 |
1.548857143 |
1.349428571 |
1.15 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Light Duty) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1005 |
0.3652 |
0.4944 |
0.5814 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1005 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
18305.0766 |
18305.0766 |
18305.0766 |
18305.0766 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1239.09 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=18305.0766 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=728.6044 [$] (10)
Light Duty Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDELE02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Duty Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1869.69 |
1389.05 |
1355.9 |
1321.96 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
16.2756 |
16.2756 |
16.2756 |
16.2756 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Light Duty) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.018537874 |
0.246969626 |
0.563077999 |
0.9774765 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.9205 |
8.0368 |
11.6944 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.018500835 |
0.24647618 |
0.561952968 |
0.9755235 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.9185 |
8.0209 |
11.6713 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
27620.9304 |
20520.4356 |
20030.7107 |
19529.3151 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
240.4394 |
240.4394 |
240.4394 |
240.4394 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRLDELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRLDELE02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDELE02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDELE02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=16.2756 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.54 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRLDELE02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRLDELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 6) Unit Capital Cost for TRLDELE02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDELE02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=240.4394 [$] (8)
Light Duty Gasoline (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDGAS01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Duty Gasoline (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.299 |
2.057 |
1.936 |
1.936 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Light Duty) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
8.325 |
3.3599 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
8.325 |
2.7974 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
8.325 |
3.3599 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
8.325 |
2.7974 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
8.3083 |
3.3532 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
8.3083 |
2.7918 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS01 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRLDGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRLDGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Residual Capacity for TRLDGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Residual Capacity for TRLDGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 7 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 7) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDGAS01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=728.6044 [$] (7)
Light Duty Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDGAS02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Duty Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1127.02 |
1127.02 |
1127.02 |
1127.02 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.862285714 |
1.714857143 |
1.567428571 |
1.42 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Light Duty) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.7699 |
10.0643 |
13.622 |
16.019 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.7699 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
16649.4665 |
16649.4665 |
16649.4665 |
16649.4665 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
728.6044 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1127.02 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRLDGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=16649.4665 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=728.6044 [$] (9)
Light Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDHYBG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2039.37 |
2039.37 |
2039.37 |
2039.37 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Four Wheel Drive) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.009259677 |
0.123361452 |
0.281257742 |
0.48825 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
30127.613 |
30127.613 |
30127.613 |
30127.613 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
364.3022 |
364.3022 |
364.3022 |
364.3022 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2039.37 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=24.66 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Gasoline for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.42 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDHYBG02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDHYBG02 for the BAU scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=30127.613 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=364.3022 [$] (10)
Light Plug-in Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRLDPHYBG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Light Plug-in Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1869.69 |
1389.05 |
1355.9 |
1321.96 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.29 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.29 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Light Duty) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.009259677 |
0.123361452 |
0.281257742 |
0.48825 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
27620.9304 |
20520.4356 |
20030.7107 |
19529.3151 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
364.3022 |
364.3022 |
364.3022 |
364.3022 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRLDPHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=24.66 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Gasoline for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.29 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Light Duty.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDPHYBG02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRLDPHYBG02 for the BAU scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Unit Capital Cost for TRLDPHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRLDPHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=364.3022 [$] (8)
Microbuses¶
Microbuses (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_Microbuses |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minbus |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Microbuses) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Public) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
8.43 |
8.43 |
8.43 |
8.43 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.4173 |
0.5212 |
0.6243 |
0.723 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.4173 |
0.5302 |
0.8148 |
0.975 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.4165 |
0.5202 |
0.6231 |
0.7216 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.4166 |
0.5291 |
0.8131 |
0.9735 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_Microbuses, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_Microbuses, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_Microbuses, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_Microbuses, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Public.
OutputActivityRatio=8.43 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Microbuses, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Microbuses for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Microbuses, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Microbuses for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Microbuses, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Microbuses for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Microbuses, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Microbuses for NDP scenario.¶
Microbus Diesel (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRMBUSDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Microbus Diesel (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
179.16 |
179.16 |
179.16 |
179.16 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
6.37 |
6.37 |
6.37 |
6.37 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Minibus) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3129 |
0.1303 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3129 |
0.1587 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3129 |
0.1303 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3129 |
0.1587 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3123 |
0.13 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3123 |
0.1584 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
4630.7485 |
4630.7485 |
4630.7485 |
4630.7485 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.03 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=179.16 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=6.37 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Residual Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Residual Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01 for the NDP and OP15C scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 7 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 7) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMBUSDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=4630.7485 [$] (8)
Microbus Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMBUSDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Microbus Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2797.83 |
2797.83 |
2797.83 |
2797.83 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
179.16 |
179.16 |
179.16 |
179.16 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
5.62 |
5.62 |
5.62 |
5.62 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Minibus) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1041 |
0.3901 |
0.6231 |
0.7216 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1041 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
72315.512 |
72315.512 |
72315.512 |
72315.512 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
4630.7485 |
4630.7485 |
4630.7485 |
4630.7485 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2797.83 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.03 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=179.16 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=5.62 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (8) shows the Operational Life for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (8)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (9)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=72315.512 [$] (10)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (11) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMBUSDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=4630.7485 [$] (11)
Microbus Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMBUSELE02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Microbus Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
6191 |
4711 |
4598 |
4485 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
59.1228 |
59.1228 |
59.1228 |
59.1228 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
3.54 |
3.54 |
3.54 |
3.54 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Minibus) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.051 |
0.6698 |
1.0554 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0509 |
0.6684 |
1.0533 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
160018.777 |
121765.217 |
118844.506 |
115923.795 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
1528.147 |
1528.147 |
1528.147 |
1528.147 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRMBUSELE02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=59.1228 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=3.54 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 5) Unit Capital Cost for TRBUSELC02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMBUSELE02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=1528.147 [$] (8)
Microbus Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMBUSHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Microbus Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
5228.01 |
3978.22 |
3882.79 |
3787.37 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
89.58 |
89.58 |
89.58 |
89.58 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.15 |
2.15 |
2.15 |
2.15 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.15 |
2.15 |
2.15 |
2.15 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Minibus) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
135128.3745 |
102825.0523 |
100358.4731 |
237695.079 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2315.3743 |
2315.3743 |
2315.3743 |
97892.1524 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=89.58 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.15 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMBUSHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2315.3743 [$] (9)
Microbus Hydrogen (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMBUSHYD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Microbus Hydrogen (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
13129 |
12302 |
11474 |
10646 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
59.1228 |
59.1228 |
59.1228 |
59.1228 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydrogen for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
4.03 |
4.03 |
4.03 |
4.03 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Minibus) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0045 |
0.0754 |
0.1239 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
339345.263 |
317969.794 |
296568.478 |
275167.162 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
1528.147 |
1528.147 |
1528.147 |
1528.147 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=59.1228 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydrogen for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=4.03 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSHYD02 for every scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSHYD02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMBUSHYD02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 4) Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSHYD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMBUSHYD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=1528.147 [$] (8)
Microbus LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMBUSLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Microbus LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3916 |
3916 |
3916 |
3916 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
25847 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
105.1 |
105.1 |
105.1 |
105.1 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LPG for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
7.32 |
7.32 |
7.32 |
7.32 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Minibus) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
101216.852 |
101216.852 |
101216.852 |
101216.852 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2716.5197 |
2716.5197 |
2716.5197 |
2716.5197 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3916 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=25847 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.1 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=105.1 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=7.32 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (8) shows the Operational Life for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (8)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Minibus.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (9)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMBUSLPG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (11) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=101216.852 [$] (11)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (12) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMBUSLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2716.5197 [$] (12)
Minivans¶
Minivan (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_Minivan |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Private) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1607 |
0.6573 |
0.9718 |
1.1401 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1604 |
0.6379 |
0.6729 |
0.7246 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1604 |
0.6559 |
0.9699 |
1.1378 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1604 |
0.6363 |
0.9716 |
0.7232 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_Minivan, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_Minivan, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_Minivan, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_Minivan, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Private.
OutputActivityRatio=2.3 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Minivan, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Minivan for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Minivan, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Minivan for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Minivan, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Minivan for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Minivan, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Minivan for the NDP scenario.¶
Minivan Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMIVDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2331.95 |
2331.95 |
2331.95 |
2331.95 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.585428571 |
2.220285714 |
1.855142857 |
1.49 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.0802 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
32972.5973 |
32972.5973 |
32972.5973 |
32972.5973 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2331.95 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVDSL02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVDSL02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=32972.5973 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (10)
Minivan Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMIVELE02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
4064.84 |
3092.81 |
3018.59 |
2944.36 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
20.3445 |
20.3445 |
20.3445 |
20.3445 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.05 |
|
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0557 |
0.5034 |
0.7102 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0555 |
0.5025 |
0.7088 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
60049.8813 |
45690.0821 |
44593.6301 |
43497.0303 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
300.5493 |
300.5493 |
300.5493 |
300.5493 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRMIVELE02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=20.3445 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.72 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 5) Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVELE02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVELE02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=300.5493 [$] (8)
Minivan Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMIVGAS02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1608.45 |
1608.45 |
1608.45 |
1608.45 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.279142857 |
2.229428571 |
2.179714286 |
2.13 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.0802 |
0.32795 |
0.48495 |
0.5689 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.0802 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
23761.6319 |
23761.6319 |
23761.6319 |
23761.6319 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1608.45 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVGAS02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMIVGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=23761.6319 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (9)
Minivan Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMIVHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3137 |
3137 |
3137 |
3137 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
46342.901 |
46342.901 |
46342.901 |
46342.901 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3137 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=30.825 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.55 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=16342.901 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=455.3777 [$] (10)
Minivan Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMIVHYBG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2038 |
2038 |
2038 |
2038 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
30.825 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.71 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.71 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
30107.374 |
30107.374 |
30107.374 |
30107.374 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
455.3777 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2038 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=30.825 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Gasoline for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.71 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=30107.374 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=455.3777 [$] (10)
Minivan LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMIVLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Minivan LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1785 |
1785 |
1785 |
1785 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
14773 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
61.65 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LGP for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.98 |
1.98 |
1.98 |
1.98 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Minivan) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
26369.805 |
26369.805 |
26369.805 |
26369.805 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
910.7554 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1785 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=14773 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=1.98 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Minivan.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMIVLPG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=26369.805 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (10)
Motorcycles¶
Motorcycles (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_Motos |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Motorcycles |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Motorcycle) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Private) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.9069 |
3.6976 |
4.4782 |
5.2725 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.9076 |
3.5905 |
3.1017 |
3.3498 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.9011 |
3.6902 |
4.4692 |
5.262 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.9024 |
3.584 |
3.0932 |
3.3437 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_Motos, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=7327 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_Motos, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Motorcycle.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_Motos, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_Motos, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Private.
OutputActivityRatio=1.1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Motos, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Motos for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Motos, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Motos for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Motos, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Motos for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Motos, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Motos for the NDP scenario.¶
Motorcycle electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMOTELC02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Motorcycle electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
202 |
202 |
202 |
202 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1.7853 |
1.7853 |
1.7853 |
1.7853 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.17 |
0.17 |
0.17 |
0.17 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Motorcycle) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.3133 |
2.3206 |
3.2831 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.3128 |
2.3142 |
3.2772 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
1480.054 |
1480.054 |
1480.054 |
1480.054 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
13.0809 |
13.0809 |
13.0809 |
13.0809 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=202 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=7327 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.64 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=1.7853 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for private transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.17 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=12 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMOTELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Motorcycle.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTELC02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTELC02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=26369.805 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMIVLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=910.7554 [$] (10)
Motorcycle Gasoline (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRMOTGAS01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Motorcycle Gasoline (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
5.41 |
5.41 |
5.41 |
5.41 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.2825 |
1.1475 |
1.08 |
1.08 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Motorcycle) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.1801 |
0.9244 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.1801 |
0.7697 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.1801 |
0.9244 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
2.1801 |
0.7697 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
2.1758 |
0.9225 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP and OP15C) |
Gvkm |
2.1758 |
0.7681 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
39.6391 |
39.6391 |
39.6391 |
39.6391 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=7327 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=61.65 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS01 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Motorcycle.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRMOTGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRMOTGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Residual Capacity for TRMOTGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Residual Capacity for TRMOTGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRMOTGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 7 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 7) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMOTGAS01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=39.6391 [$] (8)
Motorcycle Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRMOTGAS02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Motorcycle Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
122.33 |
122.33 |
122.33 |
122.33 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
7327 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
5.41 |
5.41 |
5.41 |
5.41 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for private transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.06 |
1.02 |
0.98 |
0.94 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Private Transport in Motorcycle) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.7252 |
2.7676 |
4.4692 |
5.262 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.7252 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
894.3119 |
894.3119 |
894.3119 |
894.3119 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
39.6391 |
39.6391 |
39.6391 |
39.6391 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=122.33 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=7327 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.64 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=5.41 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for private transport.

Figure 1) Input Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS02 for every scenario.¶
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=15 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Motorcycle.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRMOTGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=894.3119 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRMOTGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=39.6391 [$] (10)
Taxis¶
Taxis (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_Taxis |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxis |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Passenger Public) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.633 |
0.7924 |
0.9381 |
1.0836 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.6336 |
0.8069 |
1.2249 |
1.4605 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.6317 |
0.7908 |
0.9363 |
1.0814 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.6321 |
0.805 |
1.2219 |
1.4569 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for Techs_Taxis, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (1)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_Taxis, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Private Transport in Taxi.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (2)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (3) shows the Operational Life for Techs_Taxis, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (3)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_Taxis, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Passenger Public.
OutputActivityRatio=1.6 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Taxis, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Taxis for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Taxis, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for Techs_Taxis for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Taxis, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Taxis for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Taxis, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for Techs_Taxis for the NDP scenario.¶
Taxi Diesel (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Diesel (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.67 |
2.67 |
2.67 |
2.67 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1376 |
0.0574 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1376 |
0.0699 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1376 |
0.0574 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1376 |
0.0699 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1373 |
0.0573 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1373 |
0.0698 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.67 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRTAXDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRTAXDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRTAXDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRTAXDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2402.0813 [$] (9)
Taxi Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
375.67 |
375.67 |
375.67 |
375.67 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.33 |
1.33 |
1.33 |
1.33 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.0457 |
0.1719 |
0.2307 |
0.2665 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.0457 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
18296.6317 |
18296.6317 |
18296.6317 |
18296.6317 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=375.67 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
The equation (5) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (5)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (6)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=1.33 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (8) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (8)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (9)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=18296.6317 [$] (10)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (11) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2402.0813 [$] (11)
Taxi Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXELC02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
719 |
534 |
492 |
449 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
16.2756 |
16.2756 |
16.2756 |
16.2756 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.0156 |
0.0541 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0603 |
0.7865 |
1.229 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.0156 |
0.054 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0601 |
0.7846 |
1.226 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
35018.176 |
26007.936 |
23962.368 |
21868.096 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
792.6868 |
792.6868 |
792.6868 |
792.6868 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRTAXELC02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=16.2756 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.62 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXELC02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXELC02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXELC02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXELC02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 6 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario.

Figure 6) Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXELC02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXELC02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=792.6868 [$] (8)
Taxi Gasoline (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXGAS01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Gasoline (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.81 |
2.81 |
2.81 |
2.81 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.337 |
0.1406 |
0 |
0 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.337 |
0.1713 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.337 |
0.1406 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.337 |
0.1713 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.3363 |
0.1403 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.3363 |
0.1709 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.81 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRTAXGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRTAXGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Residual Capacity for TRTAXGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Residual Capacity for TRTAXGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXGAS01, for the NDP scenarios.

Figure 4) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS01, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS01 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 6 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS01, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 6) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS01 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXGAS01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2402.0813 [$] (8)
Taxi Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXGAS02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
341.73 |
341.73 |
341.73 |
341.73 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.64 |
1.64 |
1.64 |
1.64 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.1121 |
0.4211 |
0.565 |
0.6526 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.1121 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
16643.6179 |
16643.6179 |
16643.6179 |
16643.6179 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=341.73 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=1.64 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=16643.6179 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2402.0813 [$] (10)
Taxi Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
483 |
497 |
511 |
524 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
23524.032 |
24205.888 |
24887.744 |
25520.896 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
1201.0406 |
1201.0406 |
1201.0406 |
1201.0406 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=24.66 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.45 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=1201.0406 [$] (8)
Taxi Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXHYBG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi Hybrid Electric-Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
560.54 |
416.31 |
383.57 |
350.05 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
24.66 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
27300.5402 |
20275.9622 |
18681.3933 |
17048.8352 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
1201.0406 |
1201.0406 |
1201.0406 |
1201.0406 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=24.66 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for public transport and Gasoline for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.45 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRTAXHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=1201.0406 [$] (8)
Taxi LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRTAXLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Taxi LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
526 |
526 |
526 |
526 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
48704 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Accidents) |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
49.32 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LPG for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1.61 |
1.61 |
1.61 |
1.61 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Public Transport in Taxi) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
25618.304 |
25618.304 |
25618.304 |
25618.304 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
2402.0813 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=526 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=48704 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Accidents.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.09 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.081 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=49.32 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=1.64 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Public Transport in Taxi.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXLPG02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRTAXLPG02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=25618.304 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRTAXLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2402.0813 [$] (10)
Trains¶
Train Electric for Freight (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRXTRAIELEFRE02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Train Electric for Freight (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] (NDP) |
M$/Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for Heavy Freight Transport) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Freight Heavy) (NDP) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.99 |
2.36 |
4.1 |
TotalAnnualMinCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.99 |
2.36 |
4.1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.99 |
2.36 |
4.1 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRXTRAIELEFRE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRXTRAIELEFRE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRXTRAIELEFRE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for Heavy Freight Transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.4 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (1)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (2) shows the Operational Life for TRXTRAIELEFRE02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=50 Years (2)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRXTRAIELEFRE02, for the NDP scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Freight Heavy.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (3)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAIELEFRE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAIELEFRE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
Train Diesel (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRXTRAINDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Train Diesel (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] ( Transport in Rail) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRXTRAINDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (1)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (2) shows the Operational Life for TRXTRAINDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=20 Years (2)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRXTRAINDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport in Rail.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (3)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRXTRAINDSL01, for the every scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRXTRAINDSL01 for the every scenario.¶
Train Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRXTRAINDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Train Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for public transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport in Rail) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRXTRAINDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for public transport.
InputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (1)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (2) shows the Operational Life for TRXTRAINDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=20 Years (2)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRXTRAINDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport in Rail.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (3)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Residual Capacity for TRXTRAINDSL02, for every scenario.
ResidualCapacity=0.2 [GW] (4)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAINDSL02, for every scenario.
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity=0.2 [GW] (5)
Train Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRXTRAINELC02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Train Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] (NDP) |
M$/Gvkm |
5491.52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for Public Transport) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport in Rail) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.4444 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMinCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.4444 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.4444 |
1 |
1 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRXTRAINELC02, for NDP scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRXTRAINELC02 for NDP scenario.¶
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRXTRAINELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for Public Transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.3 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (1)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (2) shows the Operational Life for TRXTRAINELC02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=20 Years (2)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRXTRAINELC02, for NDP scenario and associated to the fuel Transport in Rail.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (3)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAINELC02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAINELC02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAINELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRXTRAINELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
Minitrucks¶
Minitrucks (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_Li_Freight |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Rail |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Freigth Light) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1.86 |
1.86 |
1.86 |
1.86 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_Li_Freight, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (1)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (2) shows the Operational Life for Techs_Li_Freight, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (2)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_He_Freight, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Freigth Light.
OutputActivityRatio=1.86 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (3)
MiniTrucks (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
3.81 |
3.81 |
3.81 |
3.81 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
1.5573 |
0.5191 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
1.5573 |
0.5191 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
1.5573 |
0.5191 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=236.83 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=3.81 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRYLFDSL01 for every scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFDSL01 for every scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFDSL01 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=4123.9208 [$] (8)
Minitrucks Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1134.12 |
1134.12 |
1134.12 |
1134.12 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
3.233 |
3.233 |
3.233 |
3.233 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.6067 |
2.3074 |
3.7265 |
4.3763 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.6066 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
19748.4316 |
19748.4316 |
19748.4316 |
19748.4316 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1134.12 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.01 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=236.83 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=7.61 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFDSL02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=19748.4316 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=4123.9208 [$] (10)
Minitrucks Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFELE02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
4190 |
4072 |
3954 |
3835 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
78.1539 |
78.1539 |
78.1539 |
78.1539 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.3535 |
3.5208 |
5.246 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.3535 |
3.5208 |
5.246 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
72960.47 |
70905.736 |
68851.002 |
66778.855 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
1360.8939 |
1360.8939 |
1360.8939 |
1360.8939 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRYLFELE02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (2)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=78.1539 [M$/Gvkm] (3)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.77 [PJ/Gvkm] (4)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFELE02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFELE02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFELE02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFELE02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario.

Figure 5) Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFELE02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFELE02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=1360.8939 [$] (7)
Minitrucks Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFGAS02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1105.71 |
1105.71 |
1105.71 |
1105.71 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.48 |
2.48 |
2.48 |
2.48 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0.9075 |
0.3025 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
1.4142 |
1.7928 |
2.1715 |
2.5502 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
1.4142 |
1.4142 |
1.4142 |
1.4142 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
1.4142 |
1.7928 |
2.1715 |
2.5502 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
1.4142 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
19253.7282 |
19253.7282 |
19253.7282 |
19253.7282 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
4123.9208 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1105.71 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=236.83 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Gasoline for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.48 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRYLFGAS02 for every scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFGAS02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFGAS02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 5 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFGAS02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 5) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFGAS02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=19253.7282 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFGAS02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=4123.9208 [$] (9)
Minitrucks Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2489 |
2489 |
2489 |
2489 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
118.415 |
118.415 |
118.415 |
118.415 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
43340.957 |
43340.957 |
43340.957 |
43340.957 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2489 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=118.415 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for light freight transport and Diesel for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.64 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=43340.957 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2061.9604 [$] (9)
Minitrucks Electric-Gasoline (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFHYBG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks Electric-Gasoline (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2453 |
2453 |
2453 |
2453 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
118.415 |
118.415 |
118.415 |
118.415 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Gasoline for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
42714.089 |
42714.089 |
42714.089 |
42714.089 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2453 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=118.415 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for light freight transport and Gasoline for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.8 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFHYBG02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=42714.089 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFHYBG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=2061.9604 [$] (9)
Minitrucks LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYLFLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Mini Trucks LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
1588 |
1588 |
1588 |
1588 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
17413 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
236.83 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LPG for light freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.48 |
2.48 |
2.48 |
2.48 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FLF_PickUpTrucks ) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.9277 |
1.0873 |
1.247 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.9277 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
27651.844 |
27651.844 |
27651.844 |
27651.844 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
2061.9604 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=1588 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=17413 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=236.83 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for light freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.48 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FLF_PickUpTrucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFLPG02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYLFLPG02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFLPG02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYLFLPG02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=27651.844 [$] (8)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYLFLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=4123.9208 [$] (9)
Trucks¶
Trucks (Grouping Technology)¶
Set codification: |
Techs_He_Freight |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Rail |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Transport Demand Freigth Heavy) |
Gpkm/ Gvkm |
11.16 |
11.16 |
11.16 |
11.16 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Input Activity Ratio for Techs_He_Freight, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
InputActivityRatio=1 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (1)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (2) shows the Operational Life for Techs_He_Freight, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=1 Years (2)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Output Activity Ratio for Techs_He_Freight, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Transport Demand Freigth Heavy.
OutputActivityRatio=11.16 [Gpkm/Gvkm] (3)
Trucks Diesel (existing)¶
Set codification: |
TRYTKDSL01 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Trucks Diesel (existing) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
464.79 |
464.79 |
464.79 |
464.79 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for light heavy transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
7.99 |
7.99 |
7.99 |
7.99 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
1.6105 |
0.6637 |
0 |
0 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
1.6105 |
0.6637 |
0 |
0 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
1.6105 |
0.6637 |
0 |
0 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
20599.9576 |
20599.9576 |
20599.9576 |
20599.9576 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=44321 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (2)
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.06 (3)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.
FixedCost=464.79 [M$/Gvkm] (4)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for light heavy transport.
InputActivityRatio=7.99 [PJ/Gvkm] (5)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (6) shows the Operational Life for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (6)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (7)
ResidualCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Residual Capacity for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Residual Capacity for TRYTKDSL01 for every scenario.¶
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKDSL01 for every scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKDSL01 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYTKDSL01, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=20599.9576 [$] (8)
Trucks Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYTKDSL02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Trucks Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
2225.63 |
2225.63 |
2225.63 |
2225.63 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
464.79 |
464.79 |
464.79 |
464.79 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for light heavy transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
6.78 |
6.78 |
6.78 |
6.78 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0.5368 |
1.9912 |
3.1626 |
3.6692 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0.5368 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
98642.1472 |
98642.1472 |
98642.1472 |
98642.1472 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
20599.9576 |
20599.9576 |
20599.9576 |
20599.9576 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=2225.63 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=44321 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.06 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=464.79 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Diesel for light heavy transport.
InputActivityRatio=6.78 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKDSL02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKDSL02 for BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKDSL02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKDSL02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=98642.1472 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYTKDSL02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=20599.9576 [$] (10)
Trucks Electric (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYTKELC02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Trucks Electric (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
4450 |
4325 |
4199 |
4074 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
153.3807 |
153.3807 |
153.3807 |
153.3807 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for heavy freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.06 |
2.06 |
2.06 |
2.06 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.09 |
0.18 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0002 |
0.1354 |
1.4254 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0002 |
0.1354 |
1.4254 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
197228.45 |
191688.325 |
186103.879 |
180563.754 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
6797.986 |
6797.986 |
6797.986 |
6797.986 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRYTKELC02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=44321 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (2)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=153.3807 [M$/Gvkm] (3)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for heavy freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.06 [PJ/Gvkm] (4)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKELC02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKELC02 for BAU scenario.¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKELC02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 4) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKELC02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 5 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario.

Figure 5) Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKELC02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYTKELC02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=6797.986 [$] (7)
Trucks Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYTKHYBD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Trucks Hybrid Electric-Diesel (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3288 |
3288 |
3288 |
3288 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
232.395 |
232.395 |
232.395 |
232.395 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Diesel for light heavy transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.21 |
2.21 |
2.21 |
2.21 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Electricity for heavy freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.21 |
2.21 |
2.21 |
2.21 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
145727.448 |
145727.448 |
145727.448 |
145727.448 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
10299.9788 |
10299.9788 |
10299.9788 |
10299.9788 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3288 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=44321 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.03 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=232.395 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Electricity for heavy freight transport and Diesel for light heavy transport.
InputActivityRatio=0.64 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKHYBD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=145727.448 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYTKHYBD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=10229.9788 [$] (10)
- Source:
This is the source.
- Description:
This is the description.
Trucks Hydrogen (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYTKHYD02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Trucks Hydrogen (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
8202 |
7685 |
7168 |
6651 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
153.3807 |
153.3807 |
153.3807 |
153.3807 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (Hydrogen for heavy freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
2.17 |
2.17 |
2.17 |
2.17 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] |
Gvkm |
0 |
0 |
0.09 |
0.18 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.0002 |
0.1354 |
1.4254 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
363520.842 |
340606.885 |
317692.928 |
294778.971 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
6797.986 |
6797.986 |
6797.986 |
6797.986 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Capital Cost for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 1) Capital Cost for TRYTKHYD02 for every scenario.¶
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Distance Driven for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=44321 [km/year] (1)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for , for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (2)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=153.3807 [M$/Gvkm] (3)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (4) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel Hydrogen for heavy freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=2.17 [PJ/Gvkm] (4)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (5) shows the Operational Life for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (5)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKHYD02 for every scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKHYD02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKHYD02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The figure 4 shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.

Figure 4) Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKHYD02 for every scenario.¶
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (7) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYTKHYD02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=6797.986 [$] (7)
Trucks LPG (new)¶
Set codification: |
TRYTKLPG02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: |
Trucks LPG (new) |
||||
Set: |
Technology |
||||
Parameter |
Unit |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
3116 |
3116 |
3116 |
3116 |
DistanceDriven[r,t,y] |
km/year |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
44321 |
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Congestion) |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
|
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y] (Health) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
FixedCost[r,t,y] |
M$/Gvkm |
387.84 |
387.84 |
387.84 |
387.84 |
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (LPG for heavy freight transport) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
8.84 |
8.84 |
8.84 |
8.84 |
OperationalLife[r,t] |
Years |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y] (FHF_Trucks) |
PJ/ Gvkm |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (BAU) |
Gvkm |
0 |
99999 |
99999 |
99999 |
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.531 |
0.6325 |
0.7338 |
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y] (NDP) |
Gvkm |
0 |
0.531 |
0 |
0 |
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
138104.236 |
138104.236 |
138104.236 |
138104.236 |
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y] |
$ |
17189.4566 |
17189.4566 |
17189.4566 |
17189.4566 |
CapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (1) shows the Capital Cost for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario.
CapitalCost=3116 [M$/Gvkm] (1)
DistanceDriven[r,t,y]¶
The equation (2) shows the Distance Driven for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario.
DistanceDriven=44321 [km/year] (2)
EmissionActivityRatio[r,t,e,m,y]¶
The equation (3) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Congestion.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.16 (3)
The equation (4) shows the Emission Activity Ratio for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the emission Health.
EmissionActivityRatio=0.03 (4)
FixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (5) shows the Fixed Cost for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario.
FixedCost=387.84 [M$/Gvkm] (5)
InputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (6) shows the Input Activity Ratio for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel LPG for heavy freight transport.
InputActivityRatio=8.84 [PJ/Gvkm] (6)
OperationalLife[r,t]¶
The equation (7) shows the Operational Life for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario.
OperationalLife=10 Years (7)
OutputActivityRatio[r,t,f,m,y]¶
The equation (8) shows the Output Activity Ratio for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario and associated to the fuel FHF_Trucks.
OutputActivityRatio=1 [PJ/Gvkm] (8)
TotalAnnualMaxCapacity[r,t,y]¶
The figure 1 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKLPG02, for the BAU scenario.

Figure 1) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKLPG02 for the BAU scenario.¶
The figure 2 shows the Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKLPG02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 2) Total Annual Max Capacity for TRYTKLPG02 for the NDP scenario.¶
TotalTechnologyAnnualActivityLowerLimit[r,t,y]¶
The figure 3 shows the Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKLPG02, for the NDP scenario.

Figure 3) Total Technology Annual Activity Lower Limit for TRYTKLPG02 for the NDP scenario.¶
UnitCapitalCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (9) shows the Unit Capital Cost for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitCapitalCost=138104.236 [$] (9)
UnitFixedCost[r,t,y]¶
The equation (10) shows the Unit Fixed Cost for TRYTKLPG02, for every scenario.
UnitFixedCost=17189.4566 [$] (10)